Push-out bond strength of CPP-ACP-modified calcium silicate-based cements

Dawood, Alaa E.; Manton, David J.; Parashos, Peter; Wong, Rebecca; Palamara, Joseph E.A.; Reynolds, Eric C.

doi:10.4012/dmj.2015-017

Cited by 18 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Biodentine also had significantly higher bond strength than ProRoot MTA in coronal dentin. These findings are similar to those of previous studies [16,19,20] . Guneser et al [16] demonstrated that Biodentine showed significantly higher bond strength than MTA, and exposure to various endodontic irrigants did not affect this finding negatively.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

“…Adhesive bond failures in the Biodentine group were slightly less common when compared to ProRoot MTA. These findings are partly in agreement with previous studies that reported adhesive failures for ProRoot MTA and cohesive failures for Biodentine [6,16,20] . The predominantly mixed failures observed for BioAggregate could have been due to weak cement or incomplete setting resulting in poor physical properties.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

“…Alsubait et al [19] reported that BioAggregate showed significantly lower bond strength compared to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. Recently, Dawood et al [20] reported that the push-out bond strength values of Biodentine were higher than those of ProRoot MTA. In a previous study, Saghiri et al [6] also reported significantly higher push-out bond strength values for nano-MTA and MTA as compared to BioAggregate cement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Push-Out Bond Strength and Surface Microhardness of Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials: An in vitro Study

Majeed

AlShwaimi²

2016

Med Princ Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

of 1 mm/min. Samples were analyzed under a light microscope to determine the nature of bond failure. Ten samples (2 mm thick) were prepared for all the materials, and Vickers microhardness was determined using a digital hardness tester. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Biodentine (42.02; 39.35 MPa) and ProRoot MTA (21.86; 34.13 MPa) showed significantly higher bond strengths than BioAggregate (6.63; 10.09 MPa) in coronal and apical root dentin, respectively ( p < 0.05). Biodentine also differed significantly from ProRoot MTA in coronal dentin. Bond failure was predominantly adhesive in Biodentine and ProRoot MTA, while BioAggregate showed predominantly mixed failure. ProRoot MTA (158.52 HV) showed significantly higher microhardness and BioAggregate (68.79 HV) showed the lowest hardness. Conclusion: Biodentine and ProRoot MTA showed higher bond strength and microhardness compared to BioAggregate. AbstractObjective: This was an in vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength and surface microhardness of calcium silicatebased biomaterials in coronal and apical root dentin. Materials and Methods: Ninety sections (2 mm thick) of coronal and apical root dentin were obtained from roots of 60 extracted teeth; the canals were enlarged to a standardized cavity diameter of 1.3 mm. Sections were randomly divided into 6 groups ( n = 15 per group), and cavities were filled with Biodentine TM , BioAggregate, or ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), according to the manufacturers' instructions. Push-out bond strength values were measured using a universal testing machine under a compressive load at a speed Significance of the StudyIn this study, the push-out bond strength and microhardness of 3 materials, ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and BioAggregate, were compared. Biodentine and ProRoot MTA had higher bond strength and microhardness values than BioAggregate, and hence could be the materials of choice for root repair procedures and retrograde fillings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Push-Out Bond Strength and Surface Microhardness of Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials: An in vitro Study

Majeed

AlShwaimi²

2016

Med Princ Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 Several studies evaluating the properties of TCSs used body fluid simulation solutions such as phosphate-buffered saline, 21,22,34 Hank's balanced salt solution to store the setting cement before testing. 2 Several studies evaluating the properties of TCSs used body fluid simulation solutions such as phosphate-buffered saline, 21,22,34 Hank's balanced salt solution to store the setting cement before testing.…”

Section: Tested Tricalcium Silicate Cement Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The physicochemical properties of TCSs are also influenced by different types of storage media. 2 Several studies evaluating the properties of TCSs used body fluid simulation solutions such as phosphate-buffered saline, 21,22,34 Hank's balanced salt solution to store the setting cement before testing. 35,36 This phosphate containing synthetic tissue fluids could negatively affect the setting of TCSs.…”

Section: Tested Tricalcium Silicate Cement Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the bond strengths of two novel bioceramic cement using a modified thin‐slice push‐out test model

Orhan

Irmak

Mumcu

2019

Int J Applied Ceramic Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OrthoMTA (OrthoMTA, BioMTA, Korea) and RetroMTA (OrthoMTA, BioMTA, Korea) have been newly developed bioceramic cements or tricalcium silicate cements (TCSs). The aim of this study was to examine the dislocation resistance of these two novel TCSs from radicular dentin, using a modified thin slice push‐out test design that simulated canal spaces of uniform dimensions. Twenty‐five single‐rooted human canine teeth were used. Longitudinal slabs were obtained from each tooth using a diamond saw. Standardized canal‐like holes were created using size #2 Peeso Reamer along the coronal, middle and apical thirds of longitudinal tooth slabs. The cavities were filled with OrthoMTA or RetroMTA. The slabs were kept at 37°C for 14‐day in 100% humidity before push‐out evaluation (MPa). Failure modes were examined with stereomicroscopy. Data were calculated using unpaired t test (P < 0.05). Location of the TCS‐filled cavities did not affect push‐out strengths. OrthoMTA (9.809 ± 2.176 MPa) had significantly higher push‐out bond strength values than ProRoot MTA (7.103 ± 2.145 MPa) (P < 0.0001). The leaf‐like bodies were seen in the fractured specimens of both TCS groups. Failure modes were predominantly adhesive in both TCS groups. It can be concluded 14‐day push‐out bond strength of OrthoMTA is higher than that of RetroMTA.

show abstract

Comparison of push‐out bond strength and apical microleakage of different calcium silicate‐based cements after using EDTA, chitosan and phytic acid irrigations

Koçak Şahin,

Ünal

2024

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research was aimed to evaluate push‐out bond strength and apical‐microleakage after application of three different calcium silicate‐based cements with irrigation solutions on simulated immature teeth. 40 maxillary permanent canine teeth were used for push‐out bond strength test, and 120 maxillary permanent incisors were used for microleakage evaluation. 120 root slices were divided into four main groups (EDTA, Chitosan, Phytic acid, and Saline) and immersed these solutiouns according to irrigation procedures. Each irrigation group was divided into 3 subgroups (Biodentine, MTA Repair HP, and NeoPUTTY). The prepared teeth were divided into four groups according to irrigation procedure for microleakage test. EDTA irrigation with Biodentine group showed highest push‐out bond strength value and saline group with Neoputty showed the lowest push‐out bond strength value. The highest microleakage value was seen in saline group with MTA Repair HP, while the lowest microleakage value was observed chitosan with Biodentine group. Chitosan and phytic acid solutions can be recommended as an alternative irrigation solution to 17% EDTA in single‐session apexification treatment, since they are non‐toxic, naturally occurring materials, effectively remove the smear layer, and have a positive effect on bond strength and apical leakage.Research HighlightsOne of the factors affecting the long‐term success of root canal treatment is a hermetic seal. Non‐hermetic or inadequate filling triggers a chronic inflammatory reaction in periapical tissues, causing fluids to enter the spaces and negatively affecting the success of the treatment. Therefore, this study will help clinicians choose the right biomaterial and irrigation solution that will affect the success of root canal treatment.

show abstract

Push-out bond strength of CPP-ACP-modified calcium silicate-based cements

Cited by 18 publications

References 32 publications

Push-Out Bond Strength and Surface Microhardness of Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials: An in vitro Study

Push-Out Bond Strength and Surface Microhardness of Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials: An in vitro Study

Evaluation of the bond strengths of two novel bioceramic cement using a modified thin‐slice push‐out test model

Comparison of push‐out bond strength and apical microleakage of different calcium silicate‐based cements after using EDTA, chitosan and phytic acid irrigations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About