1987
DOI: 10.1021/jo00233a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Push-pull intermolecular nucleophile-electrophile interactions of carbonyl groups from crystallographic data and MNDO calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out in our structure analysis of cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride [1] [4] and its derivatives [16], an obvious relationship between the postulated typical intermolecular interactions and the packing modes of 1 can be predicted. The study of the efficiency of these intermolecular interactions in inducing geometrical deformation of the structure of 1 is undertaken and the results obtained will be reported in an independent work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As pointed out in our structure analysis of cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride [1] [4] and its derivatives [16], an obvious relationship between the postulated typical intermolecular interactions and the packing modes of 1 can be predicted. The study of the efficiency of these intermolecular interactions in inducing geometrical deformation of the structure of 1 is undertaken and the results obtained will be reported in an independent work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The packing pattern reveals a large number of close intermolecular contacts among the electrophilic C-atoms (El) and their concomitant nucleophilic O-atoms (Nu) of symmetry-related molecules I and II as well as between the H-and the O-atoms of symmetryindependent molecules I and II that are within the range of the Van der Waals interactions. The significant intermolecular NuÀEl CO ¥¥¥ CO bonds that are within the presently acceptable limit (d(O ¥¥¥ C) 3.4 ä) [16], the noncovalent angles q (O ¥¥¥ CO), and the dihedral angles f (O ¥¥¥ COC) (CO being a carbonyl group) defining the NuÀEl O ¥¥¥ C atom abstraction distance are reported in Table 2. The minimum intermolecular CO ¥¥¥ CO distance is 2.957(2) ä between molecules I and 2.926(2) ä between molecules II (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover it is noticeable that the averaged value of dihedrals angles corresponding to the oxygen and carbon atom C=O as nucleophilic and electrophilic reagents which are found respectively in the average equal to 91.4° (HOpt) and to 91° (FullOpt) are close the bisecter criterium (=90°) [14]. Results from >O…C=O intermolecular interactions ( [45.5°-96.9°] (FullOpt); in the crystal of cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride, the  packing does not depend on (>O…C=O) angle and appear to be mainly on the  (CO...CO) control [14]. This can be correlated with anhydride crystal data which show an almost random distribution of  (>O…C=O) from 48.7° to 96.8° for >O…C=O intermolecular interactions [2,13].…”
Section: Results Of Theoretical Calculations and Comparison With Expementioning
confidence: 89%
“…But even more gratifying than the direct comparison is the agreement in many trends when crystal packing of 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride is compared to that of cis-1,2,3,6-THP anhydride: the shortest intermolecular C=O….C=O contacts in the 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride structure, in the range [2.957 Å to 3.191 Å], are between symmetry related of formular group, while in cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride, the closest contacts [3.023 Å to 3.30 Å] appear among symmetry independent molecules. The calculated non covalent  angles values corresponding to the d (C=O....C=O) abstraction distances in the 3,4,5,6-THP anhydride crystal packing deviate significantly from the ideal value which is assumed to be 105° [13,14] in comparison with the values calculated for cis-1,2,3,6-THP anhydride. The angles may be more accurate for C=O…C=O abstraction owing to the localisation of -electron density in the case of the cis-1,2,3,6-THP anhydride closer to the centre of the C=O bond; a trend opposite to that expected for C=O….C=O abstraction in 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride which may include electrostatic interactions as pointed out above.…”
Section: -3456-tetrahydrophthalic Anhydridementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation