Proceedings 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.03CH37405)
DOI: 10.1109/icde.2003.1260800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing aggregate constraints by divide-and-approximate

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, little overhead is incurred by bounding. Our experiments show that Bound-cubing is marginally more efficient than Star-cubing in computing iceberg cubes with monotone con-straints; it significantly outperforms the Divide and Approximate algorithm [9] for non-monotone constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Importantly, little overhead is incurred by bounding. Our experiments show that Bound-cubing is marginally more efficient than Star-cubing in computing iceberg cubes with monotone con-straints; it significantly outperforms the Divide and Approximate algorithm [9] for non-monotone constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Divide and Approximate-cubing (D&A pruning) While bounding can handle some algebraic functions with local aggregations of both signs in × and / operations, they cannot be handled by D&A [9]. The constraint " SUM/MAX" cannot be approximated by D&A pruning when SUM and MAX can be both positive and negative values, but they can be bounded.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aggregates are computed during the construction of T s . Then, BPCubing is recursively called (lines [13][14], where group-bys of dimensions after B i are computed.…”
Section: The Top-down Bound-prune Cubing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%