1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-005x.1992.tb00024.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing back the frontiers: management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes

Abstract: Drawing on primary and secondary sources the authors argue that the JIT/TQM manufacturing system intensifies work as a result of increased surveillance and monitoring of workers' activities, heightened responsibility and accountability, the harnessing of peer pressure within ‘teams' and via ‘customers', and the fostering of ‘involvement’ in waste elimination and the continuous improvement of the production process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
140
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(4 reference statements)
5
140
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, advocates of lean manufacturing claim that employees within this context work 'smarter' rather than harder and experience less work-related stress than their counterparts under mass production or Tayloristic systems (Wickens, 1995;Womack, Jones & Roos, 1990). On the other hand, critics argue that this managerial approach leads to work intensification for employees (Delbridge, Turnbull & Wilkinson, 1992) and represents 'management by stress' Parker & Slaughter, 1988). Despite these claims, surprisingly little empirical evidence exists to answer the on-going debate as to whether lean is 'mean' (Anderson-Connolly, Grunberg, Greenberg & Moore, 2002;Parker, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, advocates of lean manufacturing claim that employees within this context work 'smarter' rather than harder and experience less work-related stress than their counterparts under mass production or Tayloristic systems (Wickens, 1995;Womack, Jones & Roos, 1990). On the other hand, critics argue that this managerial approach leads to work intensification for employees (Delbridge, Turnbull & Wilkinson, 1992) and represents 'management by stress' Parker & Slaughter, 1988). Despite these claims, surprisingly little empirical evidence exists to answer the on-going debate as to whether lean is 'mean' (Anderson-Connolly, Grunberg, Greenberg & Moore, 2002;Parker, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Não obstante, a combinação de técni-cas e ênfase na motivação nas escolas de Gestão de Recursos Humanos (HRM) e Gestão para a Qualidade Total (GQT), nos anos 1990 vieram mais uma vez desafiar diretamente os pressupostos de conflito e controle inerentes à perspectiva do processo de trabalho (KNIGHTS et al, 1993;STOREY, 1995;DELBRIDGE et al, 1992). O que se seguiu foi mais de uma década de análise e debate a respeito de sugestões de que o trabalho estava se tornando mais satisfatório/unificado, e que uma forma unitária de relações industriais estava se tornando a norma na qual os sindicatos eram ou desnecessários ou mais conciliatórios (ACKERS et al, 1996;THOMPSON e SMITH, 2010).…”
Section: Trabalhando Em Cadeiasunclassified
“…Ici, les transformations par la Qualité conduisent à un contrôle plus raffiné des ouvriers par la responsabilisation et le travail d'équipe mais sans réel transfert de pouvoir entre les acteurs de l'entreprise (Dawson et Webb, 1989;Sewell et Wilkinson, 1992;Delbridge et al, 1992). La GIQ propose une «révolution mentale» dans laquelle l'autonomie et le contrôle du travail sont contrés (Tuckman, 1995) par de nouveaux moyens panoptiques de surveillance (McArdle et al, 1995).…”
Section: -Introduction: La Qualité à La Source Des Transformations Dunclassified