2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing point-spread function reconstruction to the next level: application to SPHERE/ZIMPOL

Abstract: Point spread function (PSF) reconstruction (PSF-R) is a well established technique to determine reliably and accurately the PSF from Adaptive Optics (AO) control loop data. We have successfully applied this technique to improve the precision on photometry and astrometry to observation of NGC6121 obtained with SPHERE/ZIMPOL as it will be presented in a forthcoming letter. Firstly, we present the methodology we followed to reconstruct the PSF combining pupil-plane and focal-plane measurements using using our PSF… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current galaxy imaging surveys, such as DES (Jarvis et al 2016), KIDS (Kuijken et al 2015), and CFIS (Ibata et al 2017), as well as future surveys, such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's LSST (Tyson et al 2006), the Euclid mission (Laureijs et al 2011), or the Roman Space Telescope, require an estimated determination of the instrument's point spread function (PSF). For some scientific applications, such as weak gravitational lensing (Kilbinger 2015), low-surface brightness studies (Infante-Sainz et al 2019), or analyses of diffraction-limited images in crowded stellar fields (Beltramo-Martin et al 2020), the PSF must be reconstructed with a high level of accuracy. A preliminary approach is to derive a PSF model using available information about the instrument, whereupon the model parameters are then chosen by fitting observed stars in the field to yield a PSF model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current galaxy imaging surveys, such as DES (Jarvis et al 2016), KIDS (Kuijken et al 2015), and CFIS (Ibata et al 2017), as well as future surveys, such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's LSST (Tyson et al 2006), the Euclid mission (Laureijs et al 2011), or the Roman Space Telescope, require an estimated determination of the instrument's point spread function (PSF). For some scientific applications, such as weak gravitational lensing (Kilbinger 2015), low-surface brightness studies (Infante-Sainz et al 2019), or analyses of diffraction-limited images in crowded stellar fields (Beltramo-Martin et al 2020), the PSF must be reconstructed with a high level of accuracy. A preliminary approach is to derive a PSF model using available information about the instrument, whereupon the model parameters are then chosen by fitting observed stars in the field to yield a PSF model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSF-R software we have used is able to reproduce the observed FWHM, EE, and SR with an accuracy of 2% to 4%, which is comparable to the level of accuracy reached by hybrid or calibrated techniques (see e.g., PRIME 29,30 ). Moreover, the reconstructed PSF provides a better fit to the observed data than the diffraction limited one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We give in the current section an overview on recent approaches that were developed and successfully validated on-sky, which are the analytical PSF model presented in, 21,22 the PSF reconstruction [23][24][25][26] and the hybrid PSF reconstruction. 27,28…”
Section: Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On data acquired with SPHERE/ZIMPOL in V and NIRC2 at Keck in H/K, a 1% of error on the 2D PSF estimation has been obtained. 27,28 Hybrid techniques are particularly well suited to science cases that offer access to stars in the field.…”
Section: Hybrid Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%