2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28619-4_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing Revisited: Differential Flatness, Trajectory Planning and Stabilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Howe and Cutkosky [15], Xydas and Kao [33] showed that an ellipsoidal approximation allows for a simpler representation of the limit surface geometry. In this paper we will assume an ellipsoidal approximation of the limit surface, which has been shown to be computationally efficient for simulating and planning pushing motions [21,6,25,34].…”
Section: A Limit Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howe and Cutkosky [15], Xydas and Kao [33] showed that an ellipsoidal approximation allows for a simpler representation of the limit surface geometry. In this paper we will assume an ellipsoidal approximation of the limit surface, which has been shown to be computationally efficient for simulating and planning pushing motions [21,6,25,34].…”
Section: A Limit Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit surface concept was introduced in [32] and used in [33] to model the dynamics of planar pushing. These concepts map contact point's motion to object's motion, and have been used [34]- [36] to address planning and control for planar pushing. Also, recently they were generalized to a broader set of planar tasks [37].…”
Section: B Hybrid Motion With Contact Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lynch and Mason (1996) and Zhou and Mason (2017) introduced motion planning algorithms to find open-loop robotic trajectories achieving a target object pose. Key to the success of these executions are the assumptions that sticking interactions are maintained for the entirety of the push and that the object remains unperturbed during the execution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%