2020
DOI: 10.1177/1609406920958962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing the Limits of Child Participation in Research: Reflections from a Youth-Driven Participatory Action Research (YPAR) Initiative in Uganda

Abstract: Background: Violence against children (VAC) in Uganda is recognized as an urgent dilemma; however, most research has been quantitatively oriented and has seldom involved children in the research process. Objective: We discuss what we learned about child participation in the research process as a means of informing ethical praxis in future child- and youth-led research initiatives. As an overarching aim of this paper, we utilize our engagement with YPAR as a springboard to reflect on methodological best practic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the process, teams shared knowledge, reflected on game-making, and learned through exploration and trying out different options. Our results match the previous literature, which showed the pivotal role of the child as a "process designer," in collaboration with children through designing a PD process Ritterbusch et al, 2020;Schepers, Dreessen, & Zaman, 2018). However, our study…”
Section: Summary Of Analysis and Findings For Research Questionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As part of the process, teams shared knowledge, reflected on game-making, and learned through exploration and trying out different options. Our results match the previous literature, which showed the pivotal role of the child as a "process designer," in collaboration with children through designing a PD process Ritterbusch et al, 2020;Schepers, Dreessen, & Zaman, 2018). However, our study…”
Section: Summary Of Analysis and Findings For Research Questionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Brady et al 27 Lincoln et al 28 Varjavandi 29 Contribute to the choice of research design/method Mitchell et al 30 Ritterbusch et al 31 Gray et al, 23 Nichols and Malenfant 32 Pavarini et al 18 Alderson et al 33 Liddiard et al 34 Develop data collection tools Kelly et al, 35 Noom et al, 36 Taylor et al, 37 Torronen et al 38 Garcia et al 39 Thulien et al 40 Hillier et al, 41 Ritterbusch et al 31 Dadswell et al, 22 Embleton et al, 42 Funk et al, 43 Lam et al, 44 Varjavandi, 29 van Staa et al 45 Liddiard et al 34 Recruitment Lincoln et al 28 Ritterbusch et al 31 Liddiard et al 34 Data collection Brady et al, 27 Curran et al, 46 Kelly et al, 35 Garcia et al, 39 Lincoln et al, 28 Mitchell et al, 30 Hillier et al, 41 Ritterbusch et al, 31 Coser et al, 47 Gray et al, 23 Kramer et al, 48 Lam et al, 44 Nichols and Malenfant, 32 Varjavandi, 29 van Staa et al 45 Chappell et al, 49 Liddiard et al…”
Section: Identify Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burke et al, 50 Curran et al, 46 Taylor et al, 37 Torronen et al, 38 Garcia et al, 39 Lincoln et al, 28 Mitchell et al 30 Ritterbusch et al 31 Coser et al, 47 Dadswell et al, 22 Funk et al, 43 Kramer et al, 48 Lam et al, 44 Varjavandi 29 Chappell et al, 49 Damian et al 51…”
Section: Data Analysis/ Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional research, children are used to provide data. However, a protagonist perspective places children at the centre, transforming research in which the participation of children is fundamental (Ritterbusch et al, 2020), and challenging conventional forms of knowledge construction, support and control that involve children (Cuevas-Parra and Tisdall, 2019). The influence that children have will largely depend on the level and type of participation provided (Fielding, 2012;Hart, 1997;Lundy, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%