2019
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Put freshwater megafauna on the table before they are eaten to extinction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, current monitoring and targeted conservation actions for the vast majority of freshwater megafauna appear inadequate. Compared to megafauna in terrestrial or marine realms, they have received much less research, conservation efforts, and public attention (Courchamp et al, ; He & Jähnig, ; He et al, ). For example, IUCN Red List assessments are insufficient for a quarter of all freshwater megafauna species, most notably in South America (He et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current monitoring and targeted conservation actions for the vast majority of freshwater megafauna appear inadequate. Compared to megafauna in terrestrial or marine realms, they have received much less research, conservation efforts, and public attention (Courchamp et al, ; He & Jähnig, ; He et al, ). For example, IUCN Red List assessments are insufficient for a quarter of all freshwater megafauna species, most notably in South America (He et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time is critical in protecting freshwater megafauna (He & Jähnig 2019). The window of opportunity to protect these species from extinction could be missed if conservation actions are delayed, as happened for the baiji ( Lipotes vexillifer ) and the Chinese paddlefish ( Psephurus gladius ) (Xie 2017; Zhang et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, they are underrepresented in monitoring and conservation actions, compared with terrestrial or marine megafauna (Carrizo et al. 2017; He & Jähnig 2019). For example, 49 of 207 freshwater megafauna species remain unclassified (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrestrial and marine megafauna species, which are frequently featured on covers of conservation journals (Figure 3) and popular conservation and nature magazines (Clucas et al, 2008), are the ones that receive most of research and conservation efforts (Donaldson et al, 2016;Ford et al, 2017). These species are also the ones on the list of the 10 most charismatic animals perceived by the general public (Courchamp et al, 2018), while freshwater megafauna are often overlooked (Cooke et al, 2013;Carrizo et al, 2017;He & Jähnig, 2019). Tellingly, no freshwater species has made it onto this list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research and conservation actions to safeguard freshwater biodiversity are likely inadequate as a consequence of low popularity among the general public (Monroe et al, 2009;Cooke et al, 2013). Unlike terrestrial and marine ecosystems represented by popular species such as the big cats, elephants, rhinos, polar bears, and cetaceans, freshwater life remains inconspicuous to the public eye and consequently out of sight and out of mind (Monroe et al, 2009;Darwall et al, 2018;He & Jähnig, 2019). Indeed, public perception and knowledge on biodiversity, including its status and importance, are influenced by available information (Papworth et al, 2015;Kochalski et al, 2019), which is currently biased towards certain species and ecosystems (Clark & May, 2002;Jucker et al, 2018;Mazor et al, 2018;Tydecks et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%