Putting affected people at the centre of humanitarian action: an argument for the principle of humanitarian subsidiarity

Abstract

The humanitarian system has grown organically over the course of a generation to become a complex system bound by a common primary mandate. Its guiding principles provide it with a unique identity and separate humanitarian actors from other aid-related stakeholders. However, all of the evidence suggests that humanitarian actors will extend their reach and engage in new and unprecedented ways with an expanded mandate in years to come. Now, more than ever, they are challenged to retain the moral high ground and to put disaster-affected people at the centre of humanitarian action. Consequently, this paper proposes that the humanitarian system introduce a new principle: humanitarian subsidiarity. It moves the conception of subsidiarity beyond meanings ascribed by the Catholic Church and the European Union and links it instead to the attributes of agency, accountability, and trust to find accommodation with the core humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence.

OUP accepted manuscript

“…The policy affirms that local people, services and organisations have always been the first to respond to a humanitarian crisis. The policy directs humanitarian systems to prioritise and lead through local networks and, therefore, it ensures better access to and deeper relationships with communities and a better understanding of the history, cultural and geo-political specifics of the region ( Barbelet et al , 2020 ; Betts et al , 2020 ; Gibbons et al , 2020 ; Tull, 2020 ) The agenda forefronts Indigenous knowledge as a critical source of information in humanitarian contexts ( Haque, 2019 ). The policy has steam rolled ahead since the COVID-19 pandemic and the BLM movements, providing a much needed push in NGOs to recognise the strengths of locally led humanitarian systems, and the letting go of historical power ( Spiegel, 2017 ).…”

“…COVID-19 and BLM are a wake-up call for building the next generation of humanitarian organisations, which prioritise equality, inclusion and social justice, and to fully embrace the global policy commitment to the 2016 Localisation Agenda in humanitarian responses ( Spiegel, 2017 ; Haque, 2019 ; Harris and Tuladhar, 2019 ; Barbelet et al , 2020 ; Betts et al , 2020 ; Gibbons et al , 2020 ; Tull, 2020 ). The Agenda examines the degree to which humanitarian assistance addresses the most important needs of local communities and the degree in which the humanitarian system is able to achieve positive, long-term outcomes for communities receiving support.…”

Smart Cities and COVID-19: Implications for Data Ecosystems from Lessons Learned in India

“…Accountability and trust underpin successful crisis intervention, and local acceptance cannot be taken for granted. 22 Efforts to build or strengthen local data infrastructures will first need to address the absence of community-level actors.…”

Accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in humanitarian settings: a scoping review

“…Third, alongside UN efforts, humanitarian and development NGOs and donors initiated their own processes of norm development in the late 1990s and early 2000s, including People in Aid, Sphere, and the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP) [29]. These are organizations comprised of NGO members that elaborated quality and/or accountability standards and supported members to meet those standards.…”