2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting DNA methylation in context: from genomes to gene expression in plants

Abstract: Plant DNA methylation is its own language, interpreted by the cell to maintain silencing of transposons, facilitate chromatin structure, and to ensure proper expression of some genes. Just as in any language, context is important. Rather than being a simple “on-off switch”, DNA methylation has a range of “meanings” dependent upon the underlying sequence and its location in the genome. Differences in the sequence context of individual sites are established, maintained, and interpreted by differing molecular pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
128
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(251 reference statements)
6
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA methylation, occurring in three sequence contexts in plants (mCG, mCHG, and mCHH, where H is anything but G), is largely considered to function in transposable element (TE) silencing, maintaining genome stability, and possible regulation of gene expression (Reinders et al, 2009;Law and Jacobsen, 2010;Jones, 2012;Eichten et al, 2014;Niederhuth and Schmitz, 2017). This potential effect on gene expression has raised the proposition that DNA methylation could complement genetic variation, as a mode for transferring heritable information, to contribute to phenotypic variation (Molinier et al, 2006;Heard and Martienssen, 2014;Quadrana and Colot, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA methylation, occurring in three sequence contexts in plants (mCG, mCHG, and mCHH, where H is anything but G), is largely considered to function in transposable element (TE) silencing, maintaining genome stability, and possible regulation of gene expression (Reinders et al, 2009;Law and Jacobsen, 2010;Jones, 2012;Eichten et al, 2014;Niederhuth and Schmitz, 2017). This potential effect on gene expression has raised the proposition that DNA methylation could complement genetic variation, as a mode for transferring heritable information, to contribute to phenotypic variation (Molinier et al, 2006;Heard and Martienssen, 2014;Quadrana and Colot, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it recently became evident that DNA methylation appears to control the expression of only a small number of genes (Seymour and Becker 2017) and that the impact of DNA methylation on gene expression is distinctly influenced by other epigenetic modifications including histone modification and gene silencing by small noncoding RNA (Stroud et al 2014;Du et al 2015;Niederhuth and Schmidt 2017). Thus, to fully understand the function of DNA methylation in the embryogenic transition the functional outcome of DNA methylation in the context of other epigenetic changes remains to be uncovered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of gene body methylation is still unclear. In plants and animals, mCG in gene bodies has been associated with higher gene expression, and more specifically, with constitutively expressed genes (Niederhuth & Schmitz 2016). These genes showed reduced mCG in and around the TSS.…”
Section: Dna Methylation and Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA methylation is mostly a repressive chromatin modification; however, this is not always the case (Niederhuth & Schmitz 2016). Methylation in the promoter affects transcription factor (TF) binding and, therefore, gene expression.…”
Section: Dna Methylation and Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation