2014
DOI: 10.1111/stul.12021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting our heads together: towards a syntax of particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is until recently that researchers of Arabic have become interested in the syntactic properties of particles based on a Minimalist approach [1] and [2]. The syntactic properties of particles have become the interest of recent researches including [3], [13], [20] and [21].…”
Section: Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is until recently that researchers of Arabic have become interested in the syntactic properties of particles based on a Minimalist approach [1] and [2]. The syntactic properties of particles have become the interest of recent researches including [3], [13], [20] and [21].…”
Section: Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonplace that such a property has the consequence that discourse particles are an unclear notion in syntax, (Zwicky, 1985), from which their pragmatic functions can be read off. Recently, a huge bulk of research in linguistic theory highlights that C-particles, in fact, interact with the other systems of grammar-pragmatics, semantics and syntax; hence, triggering syntactic analysis to determine their positions (Biberauer et al, 2014). For instance, it has been posited that C-particles fall outside of the sentential boundary of the clause, and so, they do not contribute to the propositional content of the utterance, being mainly related to the speaker-attitude (Hirschberg & Litman, 1993;Stede & Schmitz, 2000;Aikhenvald, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it has been posited that C-particles fall outside of the sentential boundary of the clause, and so, they do not contribute to the propositional content of the utterance, being mainly related to the speaker-attitude (Hirschberg & Litman, 1993;Stede & Schmitz, 2000;Aikhenvald, 2004). Such pragmatic-related properties have motivated many linguist to investigate the positions C-particles occupy in the syntactic structure, adopting modern generative syntactic approaches, mainly Rizzi' (1997) Split CP Hypothesis (Biberauer et al, 2014;Hack, 2014;Struckmeier, 2014). For instance, in the modern generative literature, regarding their positions, it has been proposed that C-particles, having a discourse featural make-up, head articulated projections in the C-domain of the clause; that is, they are encoded in syntax and instantiate their own syntactic projections (Biberauer & Sheehan, 2011;Cruschina, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modal particles are richly attested in Germanic, Slavic, and South East Asian languages (Bayer & Obenauer 2011;Biberauer, Haegeman & van Kemenade 2014). It is controversial whether modal particles are functionally and/or lexically articulated in Romance (Bayer, Hinterh€ olzl & Trotzke 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%