2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting the 2007/2008 global food crisis in longer-term perspective: Trends in staple food affordability in urban Zambia and Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban and male bias are the two major biases -towards towns rather than rural areas and towards men, not women -are principal factors in explaining Africa's food insecurity. Due to urban-bias and maize bias (Mason et al, 2011), subsidies for maize production and food distribution account for a major share of the national agricultural subsidy and underpin many investment programs and policy reforms in across Africa (Hanjra and Culas, 2011).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban and male bias are the two major biases -towards towns rather than rural areas and towards men, not women -are principal factors in explaining Africa's food insecurity. Due to urban-bias and maize bias (Mason et al, 2011), subsidies for maize production and food distribution account for a major share of the national agricultural subsidy and underpin many investment programs and policy reforms in across Africa (Hanjra and Culas, 2011).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a fundamental difference in the methodology that we use and that used in many recent studies of changes in poverty and/or food security, such as Headey (2011), Verpoorten, Arora, and Swinnen, (2012) and Mason, Jayne, Chapoto, and Donovan (2011). We seek to estimate the partial, ceteris paribus, effect of food price changes on poverty in a particular period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence indicates that many of the urban and rural poor rely on these less expensive ways of procuring their maize meal as long as grain is available in local markets for purchase Mason et al 2011). However, when the supply of grain in local markets dries up, consumers are forced to switch to more expensive packaged maize meal, or cut the number of meals they eat per day.…”
Section: Impacts On the Poormentioning
confidence: 99%