Putting the Patient in Patient Safety Investigations: Barriers and Strategies for Involvement

Abstract

Objectives: In an adverse event investigation, the patients have the potential to add a unique perspective because they can identify contributing factors that providers may miss. However, patients are rarely included in patient safety investigations. We aimed to identify the barriers to patient involvement in patient safety investigations and propose strategies to overcome them. Methods:We reviewed literature on active participation by patients in safety investigations to construct a framework for healthcare institutions to use in approaching patients about a potential role in investigating an error in their care. We searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, PSNet, Web of Science) for the years 1990 to 2018, without restrictions to language. Search terms included: "patient empowerment, "patient involvement," "patient participation," "patient safety investigation," "root cause analysis," "error analysis." We also examined reference lists of relevant studies to identify additional articles.Results: Our electronic search produced 10,624 records with 30 potentially eligible articles. However, we identified only 6 relevant published articles. We used these as the basis for a proposed framework that is predicated on the thoughtful disclosure of adverse events and has 3 main levels (i.e., patient, clinician, and institutional level). For each level, we identify barriers to patient participation and potential strategies to overcome them. Conclusions:The proposed framework can be used as a starting point to promote patient involvement in error investigations. Involving patients in patient safety investigations could increase patient centeredness, patient autonomy, and transparency and make analyses more effective by adding unique and potentially actionable information.

What We Have Learned from Two Decades of Epidemics and Pandemics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Burden of Frontline Healthcare Workers

“…With many countries facing again drastic surges in COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths and with the future course of the pandemic being uncertain, the current “disillusionment phase” can be described as particularly lengthy and discouraging for healthcare workers. Enhancing healthcare providers' psychological resilience by acknowledging the experienced distress and by fostering adaptive coping skills [ 18 , 129 , 148 ] can not only help them to face acute critical situations in the care for COVID-19 patients, such as difficult ethical decisions, adverse events, and breaking bad news to patients [ 149 ], but also to better deal with the persistent stress in the coming months, which, in turn, may lower the risk of high allostatic load and burnout [ 18 , 140 , 141 ].…”

Promoting the Psychological Well-Being of Healthcare Providers Facing the Burden of Adverse Events: A Systematic Review of Second Victim Support Resources

“…Finally, as others have highlighted [ 37 , 62 , 63 ], to provide a “comprehensive emotional support response” [ 37 ], p. 252, for all involved stakeholders, healthcare institutions must also ensure timely and easily accessible psychological support for patients harmed by adverse events and their caregivers.…”

Patient Safety in the Eyes of Aspiring Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review of Their Attitudes

“…Medical errors are also harmful for healthcare workers who frequently experience negative psychological effects such as guilt, anxiety, anger, depression, and feelings of inadequacy [ 4 ]. Given the broad adverse impact of medical errors on patients, their caregivers, and healthcare workers [ 5 , 6 ], their prevention must be a top priority for national and local health systems. Creating a safety culture in healthcare organizations has been recognized as a key strategy for ensuring patient safety, reducing medical errors, and improving the quality of care [ 7 ].…”