Puzzle of muons in extensive air showers

Rybczyński, M.; Włodarczyk, Z.

doi:10.1142/s0218271819500974

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In pursuit of gaining better understanding of this problem, we explore ad-hoc modifications of the hadronic interaction model Sibyll 2.3d [5][6][7]. While numerous standard [8][9][10][11][12] and exotic [13][14][15][16][17] mechanisms have been proposed to address this problem, our study specifically focuses on quantitatively evaluating several conventional mechanisms. For this purpose, we employ a customized version of Sibyll, designed for direct use in realistic EAS simulations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sibyll$^\bigstar$: ad-hoc modifications for an improved description of muon data in extensive air showers

Riehn¹,

Engel²,

Fedynitch³

2023

Proceedings of 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2023)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current simulations of air showers produced by ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) do not satisfactorily describe recent experimental data, particularly when looking at the muonic shower component relative to the electromagnetic one. Discrepancies can be seen in both average values and on an individual shower-by-shower basis. It is thought that the muonic part of the air showers isn't accurately represented in simulations, despite various attempts to boost the number of muons within standard hadronic interaction physics. In this study, we investigate whether modifying the final state of events created with Sibyll 2.3d in air shower simulations can achieve a more consistent description of the muon content observed in experimental data. We create several scenarios where we separately increase the production of baryons, 𝜌 0 , and strange particles to examine their impact on realistic air shower simulations. Our results suggest that these ad-hoc modifications can improve the simulations, providing a closer match to the observed muon content in air showers. One sideeffect of the increased muon production in the considered model versions is a smaller difference in the predicted total muon numbers for proton and iron showers. However, more research is needed to find out whether any of these adjustments offers a realistic solution to the mismatches seen in data, and to identify the precise physical process causing these changes in the model. We hope that these modified model versions will also help to develop improved machine-learning analyses of air shower data and to estimate sys. uncertainties related to shortcomings of hadronic interaction models.

show abstract