2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Py-GC/MS analyses of poly(ethylene terephthalate) film without and with the presence of tetramethylammonium acetate reagent. Comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we collected the headspace gas in the vial after the reaction and analyzed it using gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS), and we observed the presence of ethylene, water, and acetaldehyde (Figure S33). Previous studies [25b, 26] have shown that similar side products can be generated through PET thermolysis when PET is heated at a high temperature (>300 °C). The small improvement in TA yield under H 2 compared to Ar shows the limited effectiveness of UiO‐66 in hydrogen activation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, we collected the headspace gas in the vial after the reaction and analyzed it using gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS), and we observed the presence of ethylene, water, and acetaldehyde (Figure S33). Previous studies [25b, 26] have shown that similar side products can be generated through PET thermolysis when PET is heated at a high temperature (>300 °C). The small improvement in TA yield under H 2 compared to Ar shows the limited effectiveness of UiO‐66 in hydrogen activation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The total ion flow maps of the samples from Py-GC/MS were shown in Figure 6 , Figure 7 , Figure 8 and Figure 9 . The utilization of high-grade plant resources was reported, and the relative content of each component was determined using the peak normalization method [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retention times of 22%, 18%, 48%, and 12% for the sample component content were less than 10, 20, and 30 min and greater than 30 min, respectively. The molecular weight increases occurred in sample retention times greater than 30 min, 10-20 min, less than 10 min, and 20-30 min, with a higher molecular weight content than the other retention times in the 20-30 min retention period (Toraman et al 2017;Dziwiński et al 2018;Fang et al 2018;Yu et al 2018).…”
Section: Py-gc-ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%