1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00153.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrazines as warning odour components in the Monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus, and in moths of the genera Zygaena and Amata (Lepidoptera)

Abstract: 2-Methoxy-3-alkylpyrazines have been identified as odour components in Danaus plxippus, agaena lonicerae and an Australian Amata species, by means of coupled gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, with selected ion monitoring. Wide variability in pyrazine content was observed with D . p1ex;PPus and this was correlated with similar variability in the larval food-plants, Asclepias spp., which are presumed to be the odour sources for this butterfly. The importance of pyrazines in the biology of aposematic insects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this experiment, the delay between pecking the colour and its profitability was almost instantaneous. One proposed mechanism for this effect is that the sound alerts the animal to pay more attention to the visual stimulus, and thus the association with the delayed punishment would be made more readily (Rothschild et al 1984). Hultsch et al (1999) highlighted the potential importance of the role of attention in signal learning by showing that a synchronous flashing light was sufficient to enhance song learning in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in this experiment, the delay between pecking the colour and its profitability was almost instantaneous. One proposed mechanism for this effect is that the sound alerts the animal to pay more attention to the visual stimulus, and thus the association with the delayed punishment would be made more readily (Rothschild et al 1984). Hultsch et al (1999) highlighted the potential importance of the role of attention in signal learning by showing that a synchronous flashing light was sufficient to enhance song learning in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, aposematic insects that produce sounds could improve birds' abilities to learn their colour patterns, thus enhancing their survival prospects (Claridge 1974). This intersensory interaction could be more general and work between other sensory modalities, and it is possible that odours that are produced after attack will also enhance colour discrimination learning (Rothschild et al 1984).…”
Section: Proc R Soc Lond B (2002)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alkyl-substituted pyrazines are known to serve as trail-laying pheromones 98 or alarm pheromes 99 in some ants. In Lepidoptera, 2-methoxy-3-alkylpyrazines ( Figure 6, 21) were found in several taxa of aposematic butterflies and moths, and sometimes in their larval host plants 100,101 . These substances potentiate the rejection response of rats and chickens when they drink an unpalatable quinine-water solution 96,102,103 .…”
Section: Pyrazinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was thought that these additional signal components acted to enhance the speed of association between coloration and unpalatability (Claridge 1974;Rothschild et al 1984), but while there is some evidence that sounds may improve colour discrimination learning (Rowe 2002), there is no evidence that odours do so (Rowe & Guilford 1996;Rowe 1998; but see Roper & Marples 1997a for data showing an interaction between colour and odour in a learning experiment). However, the presentation of a novel sound or odour consistently causes naïve foraging chicks to bias their behaviour against food with visual traits associated with aposematism, such as food that is conspicuous, red or yellow, or novel (Marples & Roper 1996;Rowe & Guilford 1996, 1999aJetz et al 2001;Lindström et al 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%