1996
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00284-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyridinium crosslinks of collagen as a marker of bone resorption rates in children and adolescents: Normal values and clinical application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the impact of other factors such as parity, maternal diseases, and infant's sex on bone turnover in the premature infant are yet to be identified. In this study we used serum concentration of carboxy terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP) in cord blood, as a marker of fetal bone formation (6 -8), and pyridinoline (Pyd) excretion in urine as a biomarker of bone resorption (9,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of other factors such as parity, maternal diseases, and infant's sex on bone turnover in the premature infant are yet to be identified. In this study we used serum concentration of carboxy terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP) in cord blood, as a marker of fetal bone formation (6 -8), and pyridinoline (Pyd) excretion in urine as a biomarker of bone resorption (9,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, bone turnover markers do appear to have clinical utility in children (Szulc et al, 2000). They predict longitudinal growth in infants up to 18 months of age (Lieuw-A-Fa et al, 1995) and children 4 -18 y (Rauch et al, 1994) as well as response to growth hormone supplementation in children (Marowska et al, 1996), suggesting that they may be a valid short-term marker of bone changes. Furthermore, animal models have suggested that the mechanism by which isoflavones prevent bone loss is by suppression of bone turnover (Ishida et al, 1998;Tsutsumi, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepant data may be explained by the fact that subjects (AN and CO) in the Soyka study were substantially younger (mean age between 15 and 16 y) than in Stefanis' (23 -28 y) and ours (24 -26 y). Urinary Dpd is a marker of growth in normal children (Branca et al, 2002) and adolescents (Rauch et al, 1996) which experiences a dramatic increase around puberty (Marowska et al, 1996) to progressively decrease until reaching adult values by age 20 y (Vesper et al, 2002). Thus, menstruating controls in the Soyka study were likely to show higher growth velocity than amenorrheic AN patients both being in pubertal ages, and therefore higher Dpd excretion if bone resorption in AN patients had not been increased for other reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%