2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyridoxine dependent epilepsy: Is late onset a predictor for favorable outcome?

Abstract: We suggest that favorable outcome in late onset PDE might be explained by a combination of factors. A yet unknown protective factor, different genetic variations, functional variation and secondarily variation in treatment regimens and absence of neonatal seizure induced brain damage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8,47,48 Late seizure onset has been postulated as beneficial for the developmental outcome with several factors hypothesized to contribute to this outcome including genetic and functional variation, variation in the treatment regimen, absence of neonatal seizures, and unknown protective factors. 27,49 3.3 | Diagnostic investigations The initial guideline recommendations stated that PDE-ALDH7A1 should be considered in some clinical scenarios including seizures of unknown etiology, infants and children with seizures which are partially responsive to antiseizure medications, and children under 1 year of age without an apparent causal brain malformation. 25 Since those initial guidelines were published, some patients have presented after 1 year of age and into late adolescence.…”
Section: Consensus Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,8,47,48 Late seizure onset has been postulated as beneficial for the developmental outcome with several factors hypothesized to contribute to this outcome including genetic and functional variation, variation in the treatment regimen, absence of neonatal seizures, and unknown protective factors. 27,49 3.3 | Diagnostic investigations The initial guideline recommendations stated that PDE-ALDH7A1 should be considered in some clinical scenarios including seizures of unknown etiology, infants and children with seizures which are partially responsive to antiseizure medications, and children under 1 year of age without an apparent causal brain malformation. 25 Since those initial guidelines were published, some patients have presented after 1 year of age and into late adolescence.…”
Section: Consensus Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,47,48 Late seizure onset has been postulated as beneficial for the developmental outcome with several factors hypothesized to contribute to this outcome including genetic and functional variation, variation in the treatment regimen, absence of neonatal seizures, and unknown protective factors. 27,49…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her first convulsions occurred at 2 months, whereas 75-89% of patients present seizure before 28 days [11]. Neurological prognosis is often poor even in late-onset PDE [15], patients show a developmental delay, with a lower verbal IQ than the performance IQ, unlike our patient (Baxter2001 ). Several studies did not show correlations between genotype and phenotype [1,11,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We present a female patient with a late-onset PDE (this phenotype has been described by [15] and [7]). Her first convulsions occurred at 2 months, whereas 75-89% of patients present seizure before 28 days [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it is possible that the assays used do not reflect endogenous residual activity. Ultimately, cognitive outcome may largely depend on phenotypic variability, as opposed to age of diagnosis and treatment, as IQ tends to be higher in patients with late onset PDE than with classic early onset . However, the wide spectrum of cognitive outcomes in patients with PDE may be a result of multiple interacting factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%