2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(03)00450-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyritization processes and greigite formation in the advancing sulfidization front in the upper Pleistocene sediments of the Black Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FeS is eventually transformed to pyrite and adds to the pyrite formed during the limnic, sulfate-limited stage >9800 yr ago . Originally Fe 2+ had probably been present in the entire limnic sediment, but as more sulfate became available with increasing salinity, it was trapped by sulfide production, and so the sulfidization front moved downwards after the Holocene/Pleistocene transition Neretin et al, 2004). This penetration of the sulfidization front was similar at all three sites, with sulfide depletion ca.…”
Section: Sulfate Dynamics and H 2 Smentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The FeS is eventually transformed to pyrite and adds to the pyrite formed during the limnic, sulfate-limited stage >9800 yr ago . Originally Fe 2+ had probably been present in the entire limnic sediment, but as more sulfate became available with increasing salinity, it was trapped by sulfide production, and so the sulfidization front moved downwards after the Holocene/Pleistocene transition Neretin et al, 2004). This penetration of the sulfidization front was similar at all three sites, with sulfide depletion ca.…”
Section: Sulfate Dynamics and H 2 Smentioning
confidence: 89%
“…AVS/CRS ratio is in good correlation with SOC (R 2 = 0.71) and the lowest AVS/CRS ratio coincides with the lowest SOC concentration, indicating that formation of CRS, depends rather on the availability of organic matter for degradation by sulfate reduction than the availability of reactive Fe. Concentration of elemental S below 5 cm depth is similar or even larger than AVS concentration, indicating that the pyrite formation is driven by sulfide production and is formed rather by direct reaction of Fe hydroxides with H 2 S than by conversion of AVS to CRS by addition of elemental S (Lein et al, 2002;Neretin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Characterisation Of the Rupel Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sulfide concentrations were below detection limit at 480 cmbsf (core 755) and at 360 cmbsf (core 214). According to Jørgensen et al (2004), Neretin et al (2004), and Knab et al (2009), the depletion of H 2 S within Unit III is attributed to the formation of iron sulfides upon reaction with upward-diffusing Fe 2+ that is released from the limnic deposits.…”
Section: Depth Of the Sulfate-methane Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%