2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of biomass torrefied in various atmospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volatile and char yields [194] intrinsic pyrolysis kinetics of the three biopolymers but only their contribution factors [202]. Therefore, the estimation of intrinsic kinetic parameters for co-pyrolysis of torrefied biomass and coal should be possible if intrinsic parameters are available for individual pyrolysis of raw biomass and coal.…”
Section: Progress On Co-pyrolysis Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volatile and char yields [194] intrinsic pyrolysis kinetics of the three biopolymers but only their contribution factors [202]. Therefore, the estimation of intrinsic kinetic parameters for co-pyrolysis of torrefied biomass and coal should be possible if intrinsic parameters are available for individual pyrolysis of raw biomass and coal.…”
Section: Progress On Co-pyrolysis Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the kinetics perspective, it was reported that the torrefaction temperature has significant effects on kinetics data . Among the reactions occurring inside gasifiers, CO 2 −char gasification represents the rate determination step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the different oxygen concentration ranges of 3% to 9%, the solid yield gradually decreased as oxygen concentration increased, and the mass yields of liquid and gas showed opposite tendencies. This was mainly because many volatiles were previously released during the torrefaction process, and thermal cracking and oxidative reactions occurred under oxygen atmosphere (Bach et al 2017;Chen et al 2018a).…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%