“…It is also important to note that the formation of DKPs during pyrolysis of peptides displays a bias towards proline‐derived ones, presumably due to their ease of formation from Pro, and their relative stability (Fabbri et al, 2012). Hence, while diketodipyrrole has been suggested as a characteristic pyrolysis product of collagen (Stankiewicz, Hutchins, et al, 1997; Gupta, 2013; Gupta et al, 2008), reported in high abundance in archaeological collagen samples, particularly bone collagen (Adamiano et al, 2013: Kaal et al, 2016; Orsini et al, 2017) and in fossil bone and egg shell samples (Dhiman et al, 2021; Dutta et al, 2020; Umamaheswaran, Dutta, Singh, et al, 2022), based on our results we would urge caution in interpreting this signal in isolation as evidence for collagen or collagenous moieties in paleontological specimens, and rather advocate for its use as a potential indicator for the preservation of proteinaceous moieties, or potentially even diffuse amino acids. We suggest that any arguments proposed in favor of collagen preservation in fossil samples be based on the presence of a suite of DKPs, especially cyclo (Pro‐Gly) in high relative abundance, or DKPs that are unambiguously derived from hydroxyproline such as cyclo (Pro‐Hyp), as opposed to exclusively the presence of diketodipyrrole.…”