1976
DOI: 10.1139/v76-422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrolysis of iodobenzene by the toluene carrier technique and determination of D[C6H5—I]

Abstract: . Can. J. Chem. 54, 2981Chem. 54, (1976.The pyrolysis of C6H51 has been studied by the toluene carrier technique over the temperature range 861-955 K using contact times of 0.54-3.28 s and total pressures of 2.5-4.13 kPa. Percent decomposition based on analysis for residual C6HjI ranged f r o n~ 5.6-93.3(t. Only trace quantities of 1 2 were observed and when HI mas trapped o~l t the only other gaseous products were small quantities of hydrogen and methane in about a 2:l ratio. Within the limits of the expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we instead employ E 0 = 67.1 ± 0.3 kcal mol −1 , which was obtained from recent evaluations of the thermochemical data for C 6 H 5 I (Δ H r,0 = 42.2 kcal/mol) and C 6 H 5 (Δ H r,0 = 83.8 kcal/mol) by Ruscic, and is within the error bars suggested by Kumaran et al The fits to the present experimental data, Figure , now require a larger Δ E down = 800 cm −1 and a temperature-dependent η 0 = 0.04 T 0.19 , ∼0.16 over the range of the LS experiments. A consequence of the larger η 0 is that the extrapolated high pressure limit rate coefficient, k ∞ (Figure ), is increased by a factor of 2−2.8 over 1000−1800 K relative to that of Kumaran et al The experimental results of Robaugh et al lie about a factor of 3.6 lower than k ∞ and those of Kominar et al are about 50% lower. It has not been possible to produce a Gorin model that provides a satisfactory fit to the literature data and the current work by adjustments of E 0 , Δ E down , and/or η.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this work, we instead employ E 0 = 67.1 ± 0.3 kcal mol −1 , which was obtained from recent evaluations of the thermochemical data for C 6 H 5 I (Δ H r,0 = 42.2 kcal/mol) and C 6 H 5 (Δ H r,0 = 83.8 kcal/mol) by Ruscic, and is within the error bars suggested by Kumaran et al The fits to the present experimental data, Figure , now require a larger Δ E down = 800 cm −1 and a temperature-dependent η 0 = 0.04 T 0.19 , ∼0.16 over the range of the LS experiments. A consequence of the larger η 0 is that the extrapolated high pressure limit rate coefficient, k ∞ (Figure ), is increased by a factor of 2−2.8 over 1000−1800 K relative to that of Kumaran et al The experimental results of Robaugh et al lie about a factor of 3.6 lower than k ∞ and those of Kominar et al are about 50% lower. It has not been possible to produce a Gorin model that provides a satisfactory fit to the literature data and the current work by adjustments of E 0 , Δ E down , and/or η.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The rate coefficients for C−I fission, k 2a , as determined from the LS experiments are presented in Table and Figure , where they are compared with the experimental data from the literature , as well as with a restricted rotor Gorin model RRKM calculation. The present experimental k 2a values show little scatter and a clear pressure dependence which is predicted quite well by the Gorin model calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comprehensive analysis of the C–I fission in phenyl iodide decomposition has been performed by Tranter et al in their recent investigation of the self-reaction between phenyl radicals. The authors compared the experimental data present in literature with their experimental results as well as the reaction rate constants obtained with a Gorin model RRKM calculation. It is not the purpose of the present work to repeat a detailed analysis of the thermal decomposition of phenyl iodide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the oxidative addition of the Pd‐catalyst into the C(aryl)−I bond of the aryl iodide starting material is more facile than the oxidative addition into the C‐Cl bond of the acid chloride product. Indeed, with 65 kcal mol −1 , the bond energy of C(aryl)−I is weaker than the bond energy of C−Cl (74 kcal mol −1 ) in acyl chlorides . Even though DIPEA as base showed good results in the chlorocarbonylation, 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) proved to be superior in this case…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%