2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10532-011-9463-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrosequence analysis of bacterial communities in aerobic bioreactors treating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil

Abstract: Two aerobic, lab-scale, slurry-phase bioreactors were used to examine the biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in contaminated soil and the associated bacterial communities. The two bioreactors were operated under semi-continuous (draw-and-fill) conditions at a residence time of 35 days, but one was fed weekly and the other monthly. Most of the quantified PAHs, including high-molecular-weight compounds, were removed to a greater extent in the weekly-fed bioreactor, which achieved total PAH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As attempts to isolate members of AG1 in our lab using traditional methods were unsuccessful, molecular methods were used to ascertain the response of these organisms to specific environmental conditions. While sequences from this group were abundant in the untreated soil, ranging from 4-10% of total bacterial 16S rRNA genes in pyrosequence libraries (Singleton et al, accepted for publication; Singleton et al, 2011), operation of the bioreactor resulted in a declining relative abundance of AG1 sequences, with a relative abundance after 140 days of 0.3% . Anthracene-degrading Variovorax and Pigmentiphaga sequences in the untreated soil similarly declined in relative abundance during bioreactor operation, decreasing from < 1% of sequences in the untreated soil to negligible or undetectable levels Jones et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As attempts to isolate members of AG1 in our lab using traditional methods were unsuccessful, molecular methods were used to ascertain the response of these organisms to specific environmental conditions. While sequences from this group were abundant in the untreated soil, ranging from 4-10% of total bacterial 16S rRNA genes in pyrosequence libraries (Singleton et al, accepted for publication; Singleton et al, 2011), operation of the bioreactor resulted in a declining relative abundance of AG1 sequences, with a relative abundance after 140 days of 0.3% . Anthracene-degrading Variovorax and Pigmentiphaga sequences in the untreated soil similarly declined in relative abundance during bioreactor operation, decreasing from < 1% of sequences in the untreated soil to negligible or undetectable levels Jones et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 mesh before being stored in the dark at 4°C until use. The processed soil (64% sand, 30% silt, 6% clay [pH 7.6]) was treated in a bench-scale, semicontinuous, aerobic, slurry-phase bioreactor (32); 20% of the treated soil slurry was replaced every 7 days with untreated, processed soil in a buffer containing 5 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) supplemented with 2.5 mM NH 4 NO 3 ("reactor buffer"). The untreated, processed soil is also referred to below as "feed soil," and the material removed from the bioreactor is referred to as "treated soil."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bacterial strain whose 16S rRNA gene sequence placed it phylogenetically within the cluster of SIP-derived PG2 sequences, designated TR3.2 T , was successfully isolated from an aerobic bioreactor-treated, PAH-contaminated soil from the site of a former manufactured gas plant in Salisbury, NC, USA [19]. Strain TR3.2 T was isolated through serial dilutions of bioreactor-treated soil onto a modified version of the aerobic cultivation medium for Sulfuritalea hydrogenivorans [20] using a layer of oversprayed pyrene as a carbon source; this medium was also used to obtain the PAH-degrading bacterium 'Rugosibacter aromaticivorans' Ca6 [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%