2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-021-05747-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic decision support model based on consistency-adjustment strategy and consensus reaching process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is enabled by proposing an aggregation operator and a self-confidence score function to meaningfully adjust the weights of DMs. The authors in [61] introduced the new concept of Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PFLPRs) along with the Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic values (PFLVs) that account for the linguistic membership and non-membership degrees, which are driven from the Pythagorean fuzzy sets theory proposed by Yager et al in 2013 [62]. Based upon the definition of consistency, individual consensus degree (CD), and group CD for PFLPRs, a multi-step feedback mechanism is then proposed to adjust only the individual CD of the worst DM at each iteration.…”
Section: Developed Preference Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is enabled by proposing an aggregation operator and a self-confidence score function to meaningfully adjust the weights of DMs. The authors in [61] introduced the new concept of Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PFLPRs) along with the Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic values (PFLVs) that account for the linguistic membership and non-membership degrees, which are driven from the Pythagorean fuzzy sets theory proposed by Yager et al in 2013 [62]. Based upon the definition of consistency, individual consensus degree (CD), and group CD for PFLPRs, a multi-step feedback mechanism is then proposed to adjust only the individual CD of the worst DM at each iteration.…”
Section: Developed Preference Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representation Structure [61,73] Pythagorean linguistic preference relations [63] Flexible Linguistic Expressions [64] Double hierarchy linguistic preference relations [74] Comparative linguistic expressions [65][66][67] Z-numbers and their extensions [68] Nonlinear preference relations [60] Self-confident linguistic preference relations [70,71] q-rung orthopair fuzzy preference relations [72] Complex intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations [69,75,76] Probabilistic linguistic preference relations [77] Heterogeneous preference relations erence loss is then proposed for FLEs to construct the collective evaluation and the feedback mechanism benefits from consensus rules with minimum preference loss to adapt inconsistent opinions. More recently, a preference structure is proposed in [64] based upon augmenting the concepts of self-confidence degree and double hierarchy linguistic preference relation (DHLPR).…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can find that the aggregated value is also in the form of CPLS and cannot be compared with other values directly [ 40 ], the score value can be further calculated according to equation ( 2 ) mentioned in Section 2.1, which is shown as follows: …”
Section: The Basic Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of PFS is wider than that of IFSs in expressing the uncertainty in MADM problems. Ever since the first appearance of PFS, there are many studies (Yager 2013 , 2014 ; Zhang and Xu 2014 ; Peng and Yang 2015 , 2016 ; Zhang 2016a , 2016b ; Gou et al 2016 ; Mahanta and Panda 2021 ; Ma et al 2021 ;Du et al 2017 ; Akram et al 2020 ; Liu et al 2021a , 2021b , 2021c , 2021d , 2021e ; Xian and Cheng 2021 ; Zhang and Ma 2020 ; Sarkar and Biswas 2020 ; Shakeel et al 2020 ) on MADM problems under Pythagorean fuzzy circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QROFS is usually able to cope with much higher degrees of uncertainty. Since it was initiated, numerous researchers have exploited and utilized it in various areas (Wang et al 2019 ; Du et al 2021 ; Xing et al 2019 ; Ju et al 2019a , 2019b , 2020 ; Gao et al 2019 ; Garg 2021a ; Mahmood and Ali 2021a , 2021b ; Aydemir and Yilmaz Gündüz 2020 ; Rawat and Komal 2022 ; Akram et al 2021 ; Liu et al 2021a , 2021b , 2021c , 2021d , 2021e ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%