“…In the q-ROF context, apart from the development of various aggregation operators (Peng and Luo, 2021;Saha et al, 2022a), the alternative ranking techniques have become one of the focuses of many scholars. So far, various types of decision-making techniques have been extended and utilized in the q-ROF environment, and these methods can be classified according to their characteristics as: (1) the distance-based methods, such as TOPSIS (Dincer et al, 2022;Pinar et al, 2021;Ye et al, 2021;Alkan and Kahraman, 2021;Pinar and Boran, 2020;Khan et al, 2021b), TODIM (Krishankumar et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021;Arya and Kumar, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Wang and Li, 2018), VIKOR (Khan et al, 2021a;Sun et al, 2021), CODAS (Deveci et al, 2022a), EDAS (Darko and Liang, 2020;Liang et al, 2023), andMABAC (Gong et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020a); (2) the utility-based approaches, such as WASPAS (Deveci et al, 2022b;Xiao et al, 2022), ARAS (Mishra and Rani, 2021), COPRAS (Krishankumar et al, 2019) and MARCOS (Ali, 2022); (3) the distance-and utility-based hybrid approaches, such as MULTIMOORA (Mishra et al, 2022;Riaz et al, 2022;Aydemir and Gunduz, 2020), PROMETHEE Akram and Shumaiza, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021b), DNMA (Saha et al, 2022b), CoCoSo (Deveci et al, 2022c), and GLDS Liao et al, 2020); (4) other methods, such as ORESTE (Long and Liao, 2021) and Thermodynamic Zhang et al, 2021a). These aforementioned decision-making approaches have been widely applied to handle complex decision i...…”