2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q-theory, mispricing, and profitability premium: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the factor premia in China are rather large (Liu et al, 2019) and the market timing also performs well (Ma et al, 2021; Tang et al, 2021), our paper shows the superior performance of factor timing in China, extending the application of factor timing in emerging markets. The finding that the quality‐ and profitability‐related factors contribute most to the principal components also echoes their importance in China (Jiang et al, 2018). Meanwhile, with the unique features of the Chinese stock market, for instance, changeable market states and high limit‐to‐arbitrage, we discover the economic channels of factor timing through the mispricing‐based theory, in the spirit of Avramov et al (2022), which contributes to the understanding of cyclical variation in investor behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the factor premia in China are rather large (Liu et al, 2019) and the market timing also performs well (Ma et al, 2021; Tang et al, 2021), our paper shows the superior performance of factor timing in China, extending the application of factor timing in emerging markets. The finding that the quality‐ and profitability‐related factors contribute most to the principal components also echoes their importance in China (Jiang et al, 2018). Meanwhile, with the unique features of the Chinese stock market, for instance, changeable market states and high limit‐to‐arbitrage, we discover the economic channels of factor timing through the mispricing‐based theory, in the spirit of Avramov et al (2022), which contributes to the understanding of cyclical variation in investor behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We obtain data from the China Stock Market & Accounting Research (CSMAR) database from January 2004 to December 2020, including financial reports, monthly and daily stock returns and the risk‐free rate. To ensure the quality of the data, we exclude stocks with special treatment (ST) and/or particular transfer (PT) status, as they tend to be under financial distress (Carpenter et al, 2021; Jiang et al, 2018; Liao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Profitability premium is widely studied in the asset pricing literature, as more profitable firms can generate higher future stock returns (Jiang et al, 2018; Novy‐Marx, 2013; Wahal, 2019). As it has the significant power in predicting returns, profitability has become an additional factor in the well‐known pricing models of both Fama and French (2015) and Hou et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the underlying economic mechanism remains controversial. Limits to arbitrage (Lam & Wei, 2011; Shleifer & Vishny, 1997), limited attention (Corwin & Coughenour, 2008), valuation uncertainty (Lakonishok et al, 1994) and investor sentiment (Coulton et al, 2016; Huang et al, 2015; Jiang et al, 2019; Stambaugh et al, 2012; Sun et al, 2020) can be drivers of profitability premium in the stock market, whereas Hou et al (2015) and Jiang et al (2018) support risk‐based explanations. Therefore, whether the profitability premium is driven by behavioural mispricing or value investment is still worth exploring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%