QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature

Abstract

SummaryIn cost-utility analysis, the numbers of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained are aggregated according to the sum-ranking (or QALY maximisation) rule. This requires that the social value from health improvements is a simple product of gains in quality of life, length of life and the number of persons treated. The results from a systematic review of the literature suggest that QALY maximisation is descriptively flawed. Rather than being linear in quality and length of life, it would seem that social value diminishes in marginal increments of both. And rather than being neutral to the characteristics of people other than their propensity to generate QALYs, the social value of a health improvement seems to be higher if the person has worse lifetime health prospects and higher if that person has dependents. In addition, there is a desire to reduce inequalities in health. However, there are some uncertainties surrounding the results, particularly in relation to what might be affecting the responses, and there is the need for more studies of the general public that attempt to highlight the relative importance of various key factors. Copyright

A discrete choice experiment investigating preferences for funding drugs used to treat orphan diseases: an exploratory study

“…There is evidence that individual preferences regarding health can vary with the age of the patient (Dolan et al, 2005)), but it potentially limits the generalizability of our results to patient populations of a different age.…”

Valuing Health at the End of Life: An Exploratory Preference Elicitation Study

“…Hence, a preference to treat patient B may be driven by a social preference for giving priority to the young. A review by Dolan et al (2005) suggests that there is some evidence of public support for age weighting based on equity concerns. To address this issue, scenario S3 replicates S1 except that patient B is nine years older than patient A at the start of the scenario, which means that both patients will die at the same age without treatment.…”

Social determinants of health: an economic perspective

“…In principle, equity concerns can be incorporated into the cost-effectiveness approach (Hurley, 2000;Hauck et al, 2004;Dolan et al, 2005), for example by estimating a social welfare function that takes account of societal preferences for sacrificing aggregate gains in health in favour of greater overall equality in health or for greater weight to be given to the health of certain groups. Using this approach, Dolan et al (2008) found a strong willingness to prioritise interventions that improve health in groups with lower than average life expectancy, but concluded that estimating preferences for giving greater weight to the health of certain social classes per se was infeasible given the confounding effects of public attitudes to lifestyle choices and other factors.…”