2021
DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2021.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qatar Prediction Rule Using ED Indicators of COVID-19 at Triage

Abstract: Introduction: The presence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its associated disease, COVID-19 has had an enormous impact on the operations of the emergency department (ED), particularly the triage area. The aim of the study was to derive and validate a prediction rule that would be applicable to Qatar’s adult ED population to predict COVID-19-positive patients. Methods: This is a retrospective study including adult patients. The data were obtained from the elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 A Qatar-based study presented a scoring system based on a logistic regression model using predictors identified by random forest, which includes emergency department indicators (demographic data, chief complaint and vital signs) for COVID-19 positivity; the model had a 5.9 positive likelihood ratio and a 19.3 negative likelihood ratio at different cutoff points. 25 In contrast to these studies, a similar scoring system from southern Tunisia, which included contact history, fever, cough and/or dyspnea, sore throat, nausea/vomiting/diarrhea, renal/respiratory, or cardiac failure, had insufficient AUC to discriminate COVID-19 cases. 26 Our results demonstrate that the "Possible COVID-19 Case Questioning Guide for Outpatients" triage chart had high sensitivity and specificity value as a whole, with a considerable AUC for discriminating possible COVID-19 cases, similar to the currently published literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…24 A Qatar-based study presented a scoring system based on a logistic regression model using predictors identified by random forest, which includes emergency department indicators (demographic data, chief complaint and vital signs) for COVID-19 positivity; the model had a 5.9 positive likelihood ratio and a 19.3 negative likelihood ratio at different cutoff points. 25 In contrast to these studies, a similar scoring system from southern Tunisia, which included contact history, fever, cough and/or dyspnea, sore throat, nausea/vomiting/diarrhea, renal/respiratory, or cardiac failure, had insufficient AUC to discriminate COVID-19 cases. 26 Our results demonstrate that the "Possible COVID-19 Case Questioning Guide for Outpatients" triage chart had high sensitivity and specificity value as a whole, with a considerable AUC for discriminating possible COVID-19 cases, similar to the currently published literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%