2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1812.05549
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QBism and the Ithaca Desiderata

Abstract: In 1996, N. David Mermin proposed a set of desiderata for an understanding of quantum mechanics, the "Ithaca Interpretation". In 2012, Mermin became a public advocate of QBism, an interpretation due to Christopher Fuchs and Rüdiger Schack.Here, we evaluate QBism with respect to the Ithaca Interpretation's six desiderata, in the process also evaluating those desiderata themselves. This analysis reveals a genuine distinction between QBism and the IIQM, but also a natural progression from one to the other.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I have elsewhere devoted an excessive number of words to setting QBism in its historical context [88][89][90]. In this essay, I have tried to be more forward-looking, though this has involved bringing up old things to make them part of the new.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have elsewhere devoted an excessive number of words to setting QBism in its historical context [88][89][90]. In this essay, I have tried to be more forward-looking, though this has involved bringing up old things to make them part of the new.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%