1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.58.303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD and rising cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
144
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to agree with the average charged multiplicity o f minimum-bias events, one needs to set p ?min 1:3 GeV at 200 GeV and 1:45 GeV at 900 GeV. It is not clear whether the di erence is signi cant, but in the following we h a v e assumed a slow logarithmic variation p ?min = 1 : 3 + 0 : 15 ln(E cm =200) ln(900=200) : (15) Similar (constant) values have been determined when the increase of the pp total cross section with energy is interpreted as a consequence of the increasing minijet cross section [21]. This interpretation requires additional assumptions compared with a simple multiple interactions scenario, such a s (i) the value of soft (s) before unitarization, (ii) the shape of the hadronic wave function, and (iii) the matching with some di erent p h ysics in the low-energy region, where tot is decreasing with energy.…”
Section: Minimum-bias Eventsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In order to agree with the average charged multiplicity o f minimum-bias events, one needs to set p ?min 1:3 GeV at 200 GeV and 1:45 GeV at 900 GeV. It is not clear whether the di erence is signi cant, but in the following we h a v e assumed a slow logarithmic variation p ?min = 1 : 3 + 0 : 15 ln(E cm =200) ln(900=200) : (15) Similar (constant) values have been determined when the increase of the pp total cross section with energy is interpreted as a consequence of the increasing minijet cross section [21]. This interpretation requires additional assumptions compared with a simple multiple interactions scenario, such a s (i) the value of soft (s) before unitarization, (ii) the shape of the hadronic wave function, and (iii) the matching with some di erent p h ysics in the low-energy region, where tot is decreasing with energy.…”
Section: Minimum-bias Eventsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…next section). We shall use Qo = 2 GeV, since this is the lowest scale one can use when applying the parametrized parton distributions of Duke and Owens [32], and it satisfies the requirement of a perturbative scale [1,2,16,33]. Typically, for the measured points at small x the scales are less than 2 GeV, and at x~, 0.3 they are higher than that.…”
Section: Parton Distributions At An Initial Scale Q5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In onephoton exchange approximation, the differential cross section per nucleon of a deep inelastic charged lepton scattering from an unpolarized target A is given by (1), where the standard deep inelastic variables are x = XBj = Q 2 /(2Mv), y = vIE with E being the incident lepton energy and v the energy difference between the incident and scattered lepton in the laboratory frame. The squared 4-momentum of the virtual photon is denoted by q; = _Q2, the free mass of a nucleon in the target A by M and the ratio of the longitudinally and transversally polarized virtual photon absorption cross sections by R(x, Q2).…”
Section: Parton Distributions At An Initial Scale Q5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…QCD provides an obvious mechanism for this rise through the increasing number of low-energy perturbative gluon-gluon collisions, producing the so called mini-jets [20]. How to link these cross-sections to the total crosssection, without violating unitarity, was first done in the mid 80s through the eikonal mini-jet model [21,22]. Mini-jet models are used in MonteCarlo simulation programs for very high energy collisions [23], although there are some unsolved problems concerning the elastic and diffractive components of the scattering, as recently summarized in [24].…”
Section: The Eikonal Mini-jet Model With Soft Gluon K T -Resummationmentioning
confidence: 99%