2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD factorization for B→PP and B→PV decays

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

131
1,923
17
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,029 publications
(2,078 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
131
1,923
17
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been discussed in [1,2] that for this part of the phase space the same proof of factorization as for the two-body decays [3][4][5][6] is valid. However, the non-perturbative input given by the matrix elements of the factorized operators is different: in the case of three-body decays the light-cone distribution of two collinearly moving pions and the soft B → ππ form factor are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been discussed in [1,2] that for this part of the phase space the same proof of factorization as for the two-body decays [3][4][5][6] is valid. However, the non-perturbative input given by the matrix elements of the factorized operators is different: in the case of three-body decays the light-cone distribution of two collinearly moving pions and the soft B → ππ form factor are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[6]), and the objects f π , f + , F em π and F I t are non-perturbative quantities to be discussed in section 3. The amplitude in eq.…”
Section: Jhep10(2017)117mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with the theoretical predictions for these observables in Refs. [14][15][16], one would find that the experimental measurements of branching ratio are in agreement with the SM predictions within their large theoretical uncertainties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We will use the QCDF amplitudes of these decays derived in the comprehensive papers [15,26] as inputs for the SM expectations.…”
Section: 1 the Decay Amplitudes In The Smmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of heavy-light mesons has been discussed only recently [17,18], mainly due to their importance in relation with B-physics, as shown in the case of non-leptonic decays [1][2][3], semileptonic decays [19,20], radiative decays [21][22][23][24][25]. It is possible to define two twoparton distribution amplitudes φ + and φ − from the most simple non-local matrix element: It turns out that only one distribution amplitude, φ + , enters most of the computations considered in the framework of factorisation (non-leptonic decays, B → V γ, B → γℓν) at leading order in 1/m B .…”
Section: Jhep05(2009)091mentioning
confidence: 99%