2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10751-015-1139-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD symmetries and the η and η ′ in nuclei

Abstract: We discuss the role of QCD symmetries in understanding the η and η mesons in nuclear media. Recent results on the η mass in nuclei from the CBELSA/TAPS collaboration are very similar to the prediction of the Quark Meson Coupling model.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MeV, which is equal to the h¢ meson mass shift in the medium, and W 10 2.5 0 ( ) ( ) r = - MeV at the saturation density 0 r and for average h¢ momenta of » 1 GeV/c. The h¢ in-medium mass shift, determined by the CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration, is very similar to that of −37 MeV, calculated within the quark meson coupling model [7][8][9], and disfavors the larger h¢ mass shifts, downwards by up to 80-200 MeV, as predicted in [2,3,5,[12][13][14][15]. The small imaginary part of the h¢-nucleus optical potential compared to its real part provides the possibility for the observation of relatively narrow bound h¢-nucleus states [2-4, 6-8, 10-12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…MeV, which is equal to the h¢ meson mass shift in the medium, and W 10 2.5 0 ( ) ( ) r = - MeV at the saturation density 0 r and for average h¢ momenta of » 1 GeV/c. The h¢ in-medium mass shift, determined by the CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration, is very similar to that of −37 MeV, calculated within the quark meson coupling model [7][8][9], and disfavors the larger h¢ mass shifts, downwards by up to 80-200 MeV, as predicted in [2,3,5,[12][13][14][15]. The small imaginary part of the h¢-nucleus optical potential compared to its real part provides the possibility for the observation of relatively narrow bound h¢-nucleus states [2-4, 6-8, 10-12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However we do not expect the relative momentum distribution of the N * in the nucleus to depend strongly on the mass of the N * (an expectation which will be verified later numerically). We thus proceed further without a non-zero ω which would give rise to poles in (5) and make the calculation of the N * nucleus potential a formidable task. The potential in ( 5) is Fourier transformed to obtain the potential in r-space.…”
Section: A Elementary N N * Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, apart from two controversial experiments [4], there has been no definite evidence for the existence of these states. Meanwhile, the interest has also shifted from η to η ′ mesic nuclei [5]. However, the WASA group [6] is still active in the search for eta-mesic states in light nuclei (see also [7] for theoretical works on eta-mesic helium nuclei).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One finds an η ′ effective mass shift in nuclei of about -37 MeV at nuclear matter density, in excellent agreement with the prediction of the Quark Meson Coupling model [13], QMC, through coupling of the light quarks in the meson to the σ mean field inside the nucleus. The η ′ experiences an effective mass shift in nuclei which is catalysed by its gluonic component [1,14]. Although the η ′ -nucleon interaction in free space is much weaker [10] than the η-nucleon interaction [15], the small width of the η ′ in medium [16] means that the η ′ may be a good candidate for possible bound state searches, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%