2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QFlow lite dataset: A machine-learning approach to the charge states in quantum dot experiments

Abstract: BackgroundOver the past decade, machine learning techniques have revolutionized how research and science are done, from designing new materials and predicting their properties to data mining and analysis to assisting drug discovery to advancing cybersecurity. Recently, we added to this list by showing how a machine learning algorithm (a so-called learner) combined with an optimization routine can assist experimental efforts in the realm of tuning semiconductor quantum dot (QD) devices. Among other applications… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we use a pre-trained CNN to determine the current global state of the device. To prepare the CNN, we rely on a dataset of 1001 quantum dot devices generated using a modified Thomas-Fermi approximation to model a set of reference semiconductor systems comprising of a quasi-1D nanowire with a series of depletion gates whose voltages determine the number of dots, the charges on each of those dots, and the conductance through the wire [26,27]. The dataset has been constructed to be agnostic about the details of a particular geometry and material platform used for fabricating dots.…”
Section: B Quantitative Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we use a pre-trained CNN to determine the current global state of the device. To prepare the CNN, we rely on a dataset of 1001 quantum dot devices generated using a modified Thomas-Fermi approximation to model a set of reference semiconductor systems comprising of a quasi-1D nanowire with a series of depletion gates whose voltages determine the number of dots, the charges on each of those dots, and the conductance through the wire [26,27]. The dataset has been constructed to be agnostic about the details of a particular geometry and material platform used for fabricating dots.…”
Section: B Quantitative Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model used to simulate the QD devices [27] does not account for noise present in a real measurement. As a result, data used to train the CNN classifier obtained by taking a numerical gradient of the sensor data leads to very clean data, with the background uniformly flattened and charge transition lines clearly visible (see the first column in Fig.…”
Section: Appendix A: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and testing runs was reported [40]. More recently, the RBC has been verified using experimental data, both off-line (i.e., by sampling rays from pre-measured large 2D scans) and on-line (i.e., by directly measuring the device response in a ray-based fashion) [2].…”
Section: A Classification Problem Example: the Quantum Dot Datasetmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, quantum dot devices are subject to variability, and many measurements are required to characterise each device and find the conditions for qubit operation. Machine learning has been used to automate the tuning of devices from scratch, known as super coarse tuning [34][35][36] , the identification of single or double quantum dot regimes, known as coarse tuning 37,38 , and the tuning of the inter-dot tunnel couplings and other device parameters, referred to as fine tuning [39][40][41] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously developed an efficient measurement algorithm for quantum dot devices combining a deep-generative model and an informationtheoretic approach 42 . Other approaches have developed classification tools that are used in conjunction with numerical optimisation routines to navigate quantum dot current maps 37,40,43 . These methods, however, fail when there are large areas in parameter space that do not exhibit transport features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%