2018 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cenim.2018.8710977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoE and QoS Evaluation for Academic Portal in Private Higher Education Institution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main concern of decision-makers in HEIs when migrating to the cloud is the QoS aspects, whereas these aspects include for instance availability, reliability, performance [6,20], IT infrastructure [24], cost [25], human capital [26], and service provider [11]. HEIs needs to identify QoS variables from different aspects for instance regulation, cost reduction, and trustworthy [27,28], while another researcher has been identifying other factors such as performance and environments [29,30], ICT infrastructure, user satisfaction, clients' needs security, and reliability [24]. Many researchers start investigate QoS in different aspects such as [31] study QoS from perspective of SLA contract management, [32] also explore QoS from allocating optimal resources, and [33] study QoS from cloud provider aspect to how can provider collaborate consistently to procure more assets in peak time to satisfy their QoS targets.…”
Section: Quality Of Service Role In Cloud Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main concern of decision-makers in HEIs when migrating to the cloud is the QoS aspects, whereas these aspects include for instance availability, reliability, performance [6,20], IT infrastructure [24], cost [25], human capital [26], and service provider [11]. HEIs needs to identify QoS variables from different aspects for instance regulation, cost reduction, and trustworthy [27,28], while another researcher has been identifying other factors such as performance and environments [29,30], ICT infrastructure, user satisfaction, clients' needs security, and reliability [24]. Many researchers start investigate QoS in different aspects such as [31] study QoS from perspective of SLA contract management, [32] also explore QoS from allocating optimal resources, and [33] study QoS from cloud provider aspect to how can provider collaborate consistently to procure more assets in peak time to satisfy their QoS targets.…”
Section: Quality Of Service Role In Cloud Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hot-fit framework has technological and organization, this framework, unlike TOE use human factor which includes users experience and expectations which helps to identify human capital in organizations, this dimension plays a critical rule in QoS acceptance [36,44]. Additionally, HOT-fit framework [43] highlighted extra qualities, for example, fit between technological, human and organizational parameters, human dimension helps to detect human experiences in the organization [27], and fit between technology and human aspect [43]. As shown in (Fig.2).…”
Section: Figure 1: Toe Framework [34]mentioning
confidence: 99%