2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2015.7414017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoE-Based Flow Management in Software Defined Vehicular Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further reduce the number of transmission requests, a RSU with a higher probability of receiving data is selected. Different methods for measuring the quality of RSU connections, including Nakagami fading model [4] and Kriging weights [5], are applied for this purpose. For example, in Fig.…”
Section: Basic Principle Of Routing In Sdvnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To further reduce the number of transmission requests, a RSU with a higher probability of receiving data is selected. Different methods for measuring the quality of RSU connections, including Nakagami fading model [4] and Kriging weights [5], are applied for this purpose. For example, in Fig.…”
Section: Basic Principle Of Routing In Sdvnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centralized and Hybrid: For centralized routing schemes [4] [7] [8], the controller provides per-flow routes to vehicles which are more efficient for data message transmission based on the computation of the global-view controller. In contrast, hybrid routing schemes eliminate the burden of a central controller by moving the regional routing duty from central controller to local controller [3] [5]. Thus, we can classify SDVN routing schemes into centralized routing and hybrid routing.…”
Section: Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, if a vehicle A is out of the coverage range of the RSU, but can get the content service from another neighbor vehicle B, which is currently within the RSU coverage range, the RSUC could allocate more resources to vehicle B to allow content delivery to vehicle A in an Information Centric Networking (ICN) fashion [14]. Similarly, an SDN controller can manage the number of data flows per RSU, making sure each flow is served according to the expected QoS [10]. …”
Section: Sdn For Resource and Mobility Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some aspects of the benefits offered by SDN to VANETs have been investigated in the literature [7,8,9,10], but never analyzed with respect to the impact that this network paradigm may have on security and privacy when applied in VANETs. In fact, security-related issues still represent a fundamental concern that could hinder SDN growth and development to its full potential [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%