QoE Modeling Associated with QoS Impairment Parameters in 5G Networks Using AHP Decision Making Technique

Daengsi, Therdpong; Sirawongphatsara, Patsita; Pornpongtechavanich, Phisit

doi:10.1109/dasa53625.2021.9682366

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The AHP method is very useful in all areas. Hence, it is important to know which method of calculation is accurate in order to set the right order of criteria [31]. Another study reported that the inconsistency in judgment and hence in the pairwise comparison matrix of the AHP is the most significant issue to be addressed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article deals with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which can be calculated in several ways. The aim of the paper is to analyze and describe the AHP method as essential for strategic managerial decision-making to determine which method is efficient for the calculation and to set the proper order of criteria. In the contribution, we show how the AHP method can be used through different techniques. In the article, there are included methods that can be used in order to calculate the matrix in the AHP process for setting criteria. This study also focused on the accuracy of various methods used to compute AHP. The paper contains the procedure of using the Saaty method through the Excel program. The results of the research show that the most accurate method is the Saaty method. In comparison with the Saaty method is the geometric mean method with the slightest deviation (CI = 0.00010), followed by the Row sum of the adjusted Saaty matrix with deviation (CI = 0.00256), reverse sums of the Saaty matrix columns (CI = 0.00852), Arithmetic mean and Row sums of the Saaty matrix (CI = 0.01261). All of these methods are easy to calculate and can be performed without major mathematical calculations. The AHP method is often used with other methods such as SWOT, FUZZY, etc. The survey was carried out through an inquiry with managers who graduated from universities in Slovakia and showed that the respondents considered the Saaty method as the most complex and the most difficult. The geometric mean and average mean methods were regarded as the simplest methods. Respondents (44%) stated that they were able to use a program to calculate the AHP. Respondents (46%) had experience with some method related to the strategic managerial decision-making process. Managers (72%) regarded this skill as important for decision-making in their managerial position. The contribution of this paper is to show the advantages of the AHP method in its wide use in various fields.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence, it is important to know which method for calculation is accurate in order to set right order of criteria. [27] Another research reported that inconsistency in judgment and hence in pairwise comparison matrix of the AHP is the most significant issue to be addressed. Besides, analytical hierarchy processing has been widely applied on various case studies and numerous applications.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development

Štofková¹,

Krejnus²,

Štofková³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method which can be calculated by several methods. The AHP method is essential for the managerial decision-making to recognize which method is efficient for the calculation and to determine the proper order of criteria. In the article there are included methods that can be used in order to calculate the matrix in the AHP process for setting criteria such as Geometric mean, Arithmetic mean, Row sum of the adjusted the Saaty matrix, Reverse sums of the Saaty matrix columns and Row sums of the Saaty matrix. The paper is focused on the accuracy of the methods used. The results show that the most accurate method is the Saaty method, and the second most accurate method is the geometric mean in order to determine the ranking. This method is easier to use when the same order is achieved as in the Saaty method, followed by Geometric mean, which is favourable for fast and easy determination of alternatives using in the AHP process. The survey carried out among managers graduated from Universities and Colleges in Slovakia showed that the respondents considered the Saaty method as the most complex and also the most difficult method and the geometric mean average method the simplest method. 44% of respondents stated that they are capable to use a program to calculate the AHP. 46% of respondents said they had experience with some method related to the managerial decision-making process. 72% of managers regarded as important to manage some method for decision-making in their managerial position.

show abstract

“…28 Then, the network has to be considered. 31 The key outcome of a systems engineering process based on AHP is learning that occurs from the decisions. Some decisions may not work well -consequently, these can be re-modeled by changing criteria and weights.…”

Section: Zero Trust Security Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Zero trust decision analysis for next generation networks

Kroculick

2024

Disruptive Technologies in Information Sciences VIII

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zero Trust security is being adopted across companies and government organizations to continually verify cybersecurity requirements. This paper investigates architecture development methodologies that can develop a Zero Trust architecture that implements the missions of an enterprise. An enterprise architecture depends on an organization's strategic priorities and should reflect the organization's critical decisions. These decisions can be evaluated according to criteria such as interoperability, speed of operations tempo, and cyber-resilience to failures. Zero-Trust architectures must define alternatives tailored to missions. An enterprise architecture can then be developed that describes the context, operations, and resources associated with a strategic implementation decision.A multi-criteria decision-making method such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process can help guide the development and implementation of Zero Trust strategy. Zero Trust criteria are defined according to quality attributes associated with the DoD Reference Architecture Pillars, and security solutions are evaluated against how well they meet these criteria.

show abstract

QoE Modeling Associated with QoS Impairment Parameters in 5G Networks Using AHP Decision Making Technique

Cited by 8 publications

References 13 publications

Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development

Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development

Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development

Zero trust decision analysis for next generation networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About