2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2012.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS-aware dynamic MAP selection schemes in HMIPv6 networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, a tradeoff emerges when selecting anchoring nodes in the single‐anchoring approach: selecting a farther anchor may worsen the route sub‐optimality between MN and CN, while selecting a nearer anchor may introduce high signaling overhead because of frequent switching between different anchors when the MN is roaming around, as is shown by existing studies on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) . This tradeoff is also demonstrated by the evaluations in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, a tradeoff emerges when selecting anchoring nodes in the single‐anchoring approach: selecting a farther anchor may worsen the route sub‐optimality between MN and CN, while selecting a nearer anchor may introduce high signaling overhead because of frequent switching between different anchors when the MN is roaming around, as is shown by existing studies on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) . This tradeoff is also demonstrated by the evaluations in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Pack et al use the ratio of the session arrival rate to the mobility rate (SMR) as a metric in selecting anchors. Chung et al propose to make a distinction between MNs holding real‐time sessions and non‐real‐time sessions and let them select different MAPs to optimize performance. The work from Tao et al concerns more on the load of MAP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that sense Hierarchical mobility management for Mobile IPv6 is designed to reduce the amount of signalling between the MN, its Correspondent Nodes (CN), and its Home Agent (HA) [2]. The concept of a Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) network introduces a new node called the Mobility Anchor Point (MAP), which can be located at any level in a hierarchical network of routers, including the AR, and acts as a local HA for MNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMIPv6 builds hierarchical topologies, in order to benefit from reduced mobility signalling outside the local domain and improve the performance of Mobile IPv6 in terms of handover speed [2]. Two scenarios are possible during the L3 handover procedure [2]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation