2018 IEEE 37th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/pccc.2018.8711148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS-Aware Matching of Edge Computing Services to Internet of Things

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [77], [144] we propose two-sided auction mechanisms to match edge resources to IoT devices regarding the QoS requirements of the users and the QoS guarantees of the providers. In [144], we assume that one type of VM is offered by the providers and present two QoS-aware double auction based solutions namely QMECS and M-QMECS.…”
Section: Auction-based Edge Resource Management and Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [77], [144] we propose two-sided auction mechanisms to match edge resources to IoT devices regarding the QoS requirements of the users and the QoS guarantees of the providers. In [144], we assume that one type of VM is offered by the providers and present two QoS-aware double auction based solutions namely QMECS and M-QMECS.…”
Section: Auction-based Edge Resource Management and Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [77], [144] we propose two-sided auction mechanisms to match edge resources to IoT devices regarding the QoS requirements of the users and the QoS guarantees of the providers. In [144], we assume that one type of VM is offered by the providers and present two QoS-aware double auction based solutions namely QMECS and M-QMECS. Our proposed auctions not only provide efficient resource allocation solutions to maximize obtained social welfare, they also ensure that the matching providers will be able to provide the required QoS by users.…”
Section: Auction-based Edge Resource Management and Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) Stream processing time reduction: Sharghivand et al [9] proposed a two-sided matching model for allocating Fog resources to services at the edge of network considering the service response time. The approach improves the user satisfaction and quality of experience using a set of heterogeneous quality of service metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These resources-rich components placed closer to the users are called Cloudlets [5]. Cloudlets enable task offloading for resource-intensive mobile applications to provide realtime and location-aware services, while reducing traffic to the conventional cloud [3,7,8]. Strategically placing these geo-distributed cloudlets to provide low-latency computing services is a major challenge in edge computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%