2010
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2009.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS Control for Pipelines of Tasks Using Multiple Resources

Abstract: We consider soft real-time applications organised as pipelines of tasks using resources of different type (communication, computation, storage). The applications are assumed to be periodically triggered and the different tasks communicate by unidirectional buffers. The problem we cope with is how to effectively share the resources so that some specified Quality of Service (QoS) requirements are met. The QoS considered here is tightly related to the end-to-end temporal behaviour of the application. To compensat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these works consider soft real-time systems targeting multimedia applications such as Sojka et al (2011) and Dermler et al (1996). An adaptive Quality of Service (QoS) control is developed in Cucinotta and Palopoli (2010) to control the reservation during run-time.…”
Section: Resource Reservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these works consider soft real-time systems targeting multimedia applications such as Sojka et al (2011) and Dermler et al (1996). An adaptive Quality of Service (QoS) control is developed in Cucinotta and Palopoli (2010) to control the reservation during run-time.…”
Section: Resource Reservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last criterion (Section 5.3) describes conditions that a resource manager needs to satisfy in order to keep the system stable. Unlike the previous literature (with the possible exception of [Cuc10]) in this paper we do not present a particular, customized method for stabilizing a real-time system. We do not present a certain algorithm or develop a particular controller (e.g.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palopoli et al [Pa09a,Cuc10] consider resource-reservation schedulers and propose a feedback based technique for adjusting the quotas of tasks in reaction to task execution time variations. In [Cuc10] tasks share several resources and the quotas of tasks on all resources are determined together, in order to minimize end-to-end delays.…”
Section: Chapter 2 Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The downside is that they are usually conservative (they assume the worst case phasing for the task activation) and, more importantly, operate within a restricted assumption space: single processor, fixed priority preemptive scheduler, periodic activation and strict respect of every deadline (hard real-time hypotheses). In recent years, commendable extensions to the real-time scheduling theory have been made in the direction of multiprocessor systems [4,3], of relaxed timing constraints [1,18] and of distributed real-time systems [12,23,9]. Despite the relaxation of some of the hypotheses of the classic real-time task model, the applicability for real-time scheduling theory remains restricted to the adoption of specific models of computation and of homogeneous scheduling algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%