IEEE 2002 Tenth IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service (Cat. No.02EX564)
DOI: 10.1109/iwqos.2002.1006569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS-driven server migration for Internet data centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
101
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be pointed out that a number of similar models for simple, replicable applications have been proposed in recent works (Doyle et al, 2003;Ranjan et al, 2002;Villela et al, 2004) and any of these could potentially be used by our provisioning algorithm. The comparison of our model with these other models is not relevant to our current discussion of overload management and therefore beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be pointed out that a number of similar models for simple, replicable applications have been proposed in recent works (Doyle et al, 2003;Ranjan et al, 2002;Villela et al, 2004) and any of these could potentially be used by our provisioning algorithm. The comparison of our model with these other models is not relevant to our current discussion of overload management and therefore beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some papers have addressed the problem of provisioning resources at the granularity of individual servers as in our work. Ranjan et al (2002) consider the problem of dynamically varying the number of servers assigned to a single service hosted on a data center. Their objective is to minimize the number of servers needed to meet the service's QoS targets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling of a singletier system, such as a simple HTTP server, has been studied extensively. Even for a multi-tier structure which is employed ubiquitously for most servers, the system is usually abstracted as the most bottle-necked tier only: in [16], only the application tier for the e-commerce systems are modeled by a M/GI/1/PS queue; similarly in [19] the application tier with N node cluster is modeled by a G/G/N queue. Recently B. Urgaonkar et al proposed analytic models for both open and closed multi-tier systems [17,18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Liu et al, 2005) authors proposes the design of online feedback control algorithms to dynamically adjust entitlement values for a resource container on a server shared by multiple applications. The problem of provisioning resources in cluster architectures has been addressed in (Appleby et al, 2001;Ranjan et al, 2002) by allocating entire machines (dedicated model) and in (Chandra et al, 2003a;Pradhan et al, 2002;Uragonkar and Shenoy, 2004) by sharing node resources among multiple applications (shared model). Cataclysm (Sotomayor and Childers, 2005) performs overload control by bringing together admission control, adaptive service degradation and dynamic provisioning of platform resources, demonstrating that the most effective way to handle overloading must consider a combination of techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%