2002
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2002.1106156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS management in trunk-and-branch switched Ethernet networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In traditional IP (datagram) networks, there are no connection setups, and all traffic is handled in a best effort manner. Consequently, the throughput, delay, delay jitter, and packet losses suffered by connections are all subject to the statistical nature of network traffic [5] [6]. Managing QoS is difficult in such networks.…”
Section: Qos Management In Home Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In traditional IP (datagram) networks, there are no connection setups, and all traffic is handled in a best effort manner. Consequently, the throughput, delay, delay jitter, and packet losses suffered by connections are all subject to the statistical nature of network traffic [5] [6]. Managing QoS is difficult in such networks.…”
Section: Qos Management In Home Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the IntServ approach, packets belonging to a flow (connection) are made to follow a fixed path (unlike conventional datagram networks where each packet, in principle, can follow a different path to the destination), and resources are reserved for that flow at intermediate routers on that path [5] [6]. This requires a connection setup phase using the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP).…”
Section: Qos Management In Home Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%