2014 1st International Workshop on Cognitive Cellular Systems (CCS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ccs.2014.6933810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS of cognitive and primary networks and spectrum sensing tradeoff using always transmit strategy over Nakagami-m fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spectrum underlay, to guarantee certain QoS for primary user's communication, several metrics have been proposed in to measure and control the interference caused by secondary system on primary system. The first metric in uses the ICL as a maximum interference power that is maintained at primary receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spectrum underlay, to guarantee certain QoS for primary user's communication, several metrics have been proposed in to measure and control the interference caused by secondary system on primary system. The first metric in uses the ICL as a maximum interference power that is maintained at primary receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second metric in restricts the interference power on the requirement of a minimum transmission rate in terms of signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) of the primary system. The third metric in restricts the interference power on the basis of the OPL that limits the maximum outage/degradation of the primary system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second metric in [6] restricts the interference power on the requirement of a minimum transmission rate in term of SINR of the primary system. The third metric in [7] [8] restricts the interference power on the basis of the OPL that limits the maximum outage/degradation of the primary system. However, measure the QoS at primary system only by ICL is better for primary system, since it is protected instantaneously from cognitive network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by cooperative communications and our results in [17,18], in this paper, we extend our strategy ' AT' (the cognitive source (CS) will be able to transmit over all time slots and in any time slot, then, it will be able to operate continuously whenever either the primary user is active or absent) into cognitive relay selection. We derive the closed form of outage probability of relay selection in dual-hop transmission over independent but not necessarily identically distributed (i.n.i.d.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous works [16], where we have introduced our new strategy of transmission 'Always Transmit (AT): to enhance the cognitive sources of data transmission and to provide continuous transmit solution by using mixed strategies in cognitive radio context, which it performed via the combination of the underlay and interweave approaches depending on the activity of the primary system' and have shown that it outperforms other conventional cognitive radio strategies for power transmission and interference management, in [17], where we have derived the closed form and analyzed the performance of outage probability over Rayleigh fading, and in [18], where we have studied the trade-off between spectrum sensing duration and the QoS at cognitive network while guaranteeing certain QoS at primary network controlled by the outage probability limit, over independent but not necessarily identically distributed Nakagami-m channels. In (M Ridouani, A Hayar, A Haqiq, Continuous-transmit in cognitive radio systems: perform sensing and transmission in parallel anytime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%