2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-021-02879-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qp, Qs, Qc, Qi, and $$Q_{{s_{c} }}$$ Attenuation Parameters in the Zagros Region, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their observation, the average values of 93, 110, 165, 325, and 571 have been obtained at five central-frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 Hz respectively using data recorded within an epicentral distance of 100 km. Considering the magnitude range of the selected earthquakes (Mw ≥ 5.0) and analyzing the P-wave displacement spectra, the dominant corner frequency range does not exceed 6 to 7 Hz which corresponds to values in the range 93–165 according to the study by Talebi et al 39 . In our study, considering possible uncertainties on the estimation of , we decided to explore the source parameter sensitivity to seismic attenuation with values ranging from 50 to 200, although Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to their observation, the average values of 93, 110, 165, 325, and 571 have been obtained at five central-frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 Hz respectively using data recorded within an epicentral distance of 100 km. Considering the magnitude range of the selected earthquakes (Mw ≥ 5.0) and analyzing the P-wave displacement spectra, the dominant corner frequency range does not exceed 6 to 7 Hz which corresponds to values in the range 93–165 according to the study by Talebi et al 39 . In our study, considering possible uncertainties on the estimation of , we decided to explore the source parameter sensitivity to seismic attenuation with values ranging from 50 to 200, although Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As for the anelastic attenuation correction, using a previously known P-wave, frequency independent quality factor for the region of concern, we refer to the study of Talebi et al 39 , in which different attenuation factors are estimated using the extended coda normalization method by analyzing more than 6421 local events with a magnitude range of 3 to 5.5 that occurred from 2006 to 2019 within the studied area. Looking at the spatial variation of the quality factor, Talebi et al 39 concluded the higher attenuation in the northern parts of the Zagros region than in the southern part. Note that there is no overlap between this high-attenuation area and region including our dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the anelastic attenuation correction, using a previously known P-wave, frequency independent quality factor for the region of concern, we refer to the study of Talebi et al, [38], in which different attenuation factors are estimated using the extended coda normalization method by analyzing more than 6421 local events with a magnitude range of 3 to 5.5 that occurred from 2006 to 2019 within the studied area. Looking at the spatial variation of the quality factor, Talebi et al, [38] concluded the higher attenuation in the northern parts of the Zagros region than in the southern part. According to their observation, the average 𝑄 𝑃 values of 93, 110, 165, 325, and 571…”
Section: Figures 3a and 3bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been obtained at five central-frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 Hz respectively using data recorded within an epicentral distance of 100 km. Considering the magnitude range of the selected earthquakes (Mw≥5.0) and analyzing the P-wave displacement spectra, the dominant corner frequency range is not exceeding 6 to 7 Hz that corresponds to 𝑄 𝑃 values in the range 93-165 according to the study by Talebi et al, [38]. In our study, considering possible uncertainties on the estimate of Qp, we decided to explore the source parameter sensitivity to seismic attenuation with 𝑄 𝑃 values ranging from 50 to 200, although Figures 3-5 present the result for the case 𝑄 𝑃 = 100.…”
Section: Figures 3a and 3bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial variation in coda Q in the northeastern part of Niigata-Kobe Tectonic Zone, central Japan, was explored by Dojo and Hiramatsu (2017). Several studies have been carried out over a decade on the Quality factor features in the Iranian plateau (Ma'hood and Hamzehloo 2009;Rahimi et al 2010;Gholamzadeh et al 2014;Ahmadzadeh Iran Doust et al 2016;Naghavi et al 2017;Amiri Fard et al 2019;Talebi et al 2021). Rahimi et al (2010) Q that show a good correlation with Quaternary sediments and the Sahnad, Sabalan volcanic zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%