2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QSA influences on isotopic ratio measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nanoSIMS has previously been used to analyze sulfur isotopes in minerals (Slodzian et al, 2004;Hoppe et al, 2005) and carbon, nitrogen and sulfur distributions in biological samples (Clode et al, 2007;Li et al, 2008). For the present study, data were obtained using electron multiplier multi-collection, operating with the cesium (Cs þ ) ion source.…”
Section: Nanosims Analysis and Isotopic Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nanoSIMS has previously been used to analyze sulfur isotopes in minerals (Slodzian et al, 2004;Hoppe et al, 2005) and carbon, nitrogen and sulfur distributions in biological samples (Clode et al, 2007;Li et al, 2008). For the present study, data were obtained using electron multiplier multi-collection, operating with the cesium (Cs þ ) ion source.…”
Section: Nanosims Analysis and Isotopic Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no observed temporal trend in the isotope ratio of sulfide (Supplemental Figure S3), strongly suggesting that the decreasing yield did not cause an isotopic offset in the data. The nanoSIMS-generated data set was also examined for evidence of a quasisimultaneous arrival (QSA) effect, which has been suggested to generate isotopic fractionations during sulfur isotope (and other) measurements made using electron multipliers on the nanoSIMS (Slodzian et al, 2004). Operating conditions (Ko0.0025) indicate that any correction would have been minimal (o2%), and no evidence for this effect was observed in analysis of 4300 data points.…”
Section: Nanosims Analysis and Isotopic Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correction for the quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) effect was carried out as described by Slodzian et al (2004), however a factor of 0.75 rather than 0.69 was used as this minimised the dependence on count rate best for these samples.…”
Section: Nanosimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isotope ratios were determined with the L'Image software developed by L. Nittler, Carnegie Institution of Washington, DC. One could expect the quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) effect on C isotopes (Slodzian et al 2004). However, in our experiments, no variations of the instrumental fractionation factor with count rates were observed.…”
Section: Samples and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%