2020
DOI: 10.34172/ps.2019.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QSAR and Molecular Docking Studies on Non-Imidazole-Based Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists

Abstract: Background: In the recent years, histamine H3 receptor (H3R) has been receiving increasing attention in pharmacotherapy of neurological disorders. The aim of the current study was to investigate structural requirements for the prediction of H3 antagonistic activity using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and molecular docking techniques. Methods: To this end, genetic algorithm coupled partial least square and stepwise multiple linear regression methods were employed for developi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The verification and validity [67][68][69] of the QSPR models were assessed by different fitting criteria; internal cross-validation using leave-one out (LOO) method and the external validation parameters [70][71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The verification and validity [67][68][69] of the QSPR models were assessed by different fitting criteria; internal cross-validation using leave-one out (LOO) method and the external validation parameters [70][71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model, employing a genetic algorithm coupled with partial least square and stepwise multiple linear regression methods, was used with two major descriptors: connectivity information and mean absolute charge in predicting H 3 R antagonistic activity. The additional molecular docking revealed the crucial role of residues Y 3.33 , Y189 ECL2 , F193 ECL2 , L 5.39 , E 5.46 , W 6.48 , Y 6.51 , M 6.55 , Y 7.35 and F 7.39 in the interaction with H 3 R targeted ligands [ 91 ]. Schaller et al [ 52 ] used a ligand-guided homology modeling strategy that resulted in identification of two H 3 R ligands with nanomolar affinity, including Compound 8 (Z27743747) in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Hr-targeted Ligands and Receptor Binding Site Of Inactivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five criteria proposed in authentic journals were selected in this study and details have been described in method section. They are highly cited and several researchers were used them to evaluate validity of QSAR models [15][16][17][18]. Designers of each criterion have been shown advantages of them in comparison with others for external validation of QSAR models [5,6,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%