2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QSPR study on solubility of some fullerenes derivatives using the genetic algorithms — Multiple linear regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such cases include constant or near constant descriptors with low variance, descriptors with missing or zero values, and collinear highly correlated pairs of variables. In the case of correlated variables, the one with higher correlation with the endpoint is chosen in developing the model [23]. In addition to descriptors' reduction, a feature selection process is followed in order to optimize the performance of the model.…”
Section: Feature Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such cases include constant or near constant descriptors with low variance, descriptors with missing or zero values, and collinear highly correlated pairs of variables. In the case of correlated variables, the one with higher correlation with the endpoint is chosen in developing the model [23]. In addition to descriptors' reduction, a feature selection process is followed in order to optimize the performance of the model.…”
Section: Feature Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robustness metrics such as squared cross validated correlation coefficient (Q 2 ), leave-one-out cross-validation coefficient (Q 2 LOO ), and leave-many-out cross-validation coefficients (Q 2 LMO−10% and Q 2 LMO−25% ) are popular robustness indicators [46,47]. To avoid the possibility of overestimation by using only leave-one-out cross validation, a bootstrap procedure (Q 2 Boot ) is suggested [23] and is mainly suitable for a limited number of training cases [50]. These approaches systematically take out data points from the training set, reconstructing the model, and then predict the left-out data points.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to QSAR studies, a molecular docking method representing the true conformation of the compound in protein bonding sites was performed [60]. To perform a docking analysis, AutoDock 4.2 [61] was used to understand the interactions between the most potent B-raf 600E inhibitor in the data set and this kinase.…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these works are based on the applications of classic Molecular Dynamics methods (MD). 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 Nevertheless, Density Functional Theory (DFT) simulations 12 or quantitative structure properties relationship (QSPR) 13 studies have been also published. Among the new alternatives studied for C 60 dispersion in solvents, the recent works by Chaban et al 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%