2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2004.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QT interval measurement in the dog: Chest leads versus limb leads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the better correlation between potassium level and QT recorded in CV5RL, compared with DII values, shows that the former lead gives more accurate results. This is consistent with the findings of a previous study and is explained by a better definition of the end of the T wave and, consequently, lower error in measuring the QT duration in CV5RL (Nahas & Geffray 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the better correlation between potassium level and QT recorded in CV5RL, compared with DII values, shows that the former lead gives more accurate results. This is consistent with the findings of a previous study and is explained by a better definition of the end of the T wave and, consequently, lower error in measuring the QT duration in CV5RL (Nahas & Geffray 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Other reports recommend this measurement in leads II, V 2 and V 3 , because the T wave is always well defined and often reaches the maximal amplitude in these leads (Elming et al, 2003;Viskin et al, 2003;Vohra, 2003;Fenichel et al, 2004;Charbit et al, 2006). A similar situation has been determined in dogs, where the lead CV 5 RL seems to produce less intra-and inter-animal variability as it well defined at the end (Nahas and Geffray, 2004). Other authors claim that the QTi can be measured from the longest QT period in a strip if the lead is well defined or not (Fenichel et al, 2004).…”
Section: Measurement Of the Qt Intervalsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…During recording of ECG, goats were kept in a wooden box. Needle electrodes were inserted subcutaneously proximal to the olecranon on the caudal aspect of the right and left forelegs for the right and left arm wires, respectively, and in the external aspect of the stifle joint of the right and left leg wires, respectively [17]. The three standard bipolar limb leads (I, II, and III) and augmented unipolar limb leads (aVR, aVL and aVF) were recorded on paper using a threechannel physiograph (Medicare, Chandigarh).…”
Section: Electrocardiogram Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%