1990
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/16/11/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic M1 operator in the IBA

Abstract: In the basic interacting-boson model (sd I B A -I ) , as well as in other onefluid collective models of nuclear structure, the magnetic dipole operator in leading order is proportional to the angular momentum and cannot produce transitions. Phenomenological second-order terms are therefore needed. The origin of these terms in IBA-1 is traced back to the proton-neutron two-fluid model IBA-2 in two ways.First, an IBA-2 second-order M1 operator is proposed as a mapping of the linear operator to the space of pure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above result is in accordance with that of Strutinsky (1956) which has been confirmed by Leander et a1 (1986). Bohr and Mottelson (1958), and Lipas (1963) gave results which differ from (2.86) in numerical coefficients. Surface effects are not taken into account when deriving formula (2.84), whereas, according to the droplet model Swiatecki 1969, 1974), these contribute to the electric dipole moment since the centre of mass of the neutron skin does not coincide, in general, with the centre of mass of the bulk.…”
Section: And(el P I = E P P R Y L W ( ? ) D3rmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The above result is in accordance with that of Strutinsky (1956) which has been confirmed by Leander et a1 (1986). Bohr and Mottelson (1958), and Lipas (1963) gave results which differ from (2.86) in numerical coefficients. Surface effects are not taken into account when deriving formula (2.84), whereas, according to the droplet model Swiatecki 1969, 1974), these contribute to the electric dipole moment since the centre of mass of the neutron skin does not coincide, in general, with the centre of mass of the bulk.…”
Section: And(el P I = E P P R Y L W ( ? ) D3rmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore,the observed E1 transition ampli- tudes are entirely due to the non uniformity of the nuclear charge distribution [45]. To calculate the value of B(E1)= (i||M(E1)||f ) 2 /(2J i + 1), the E1 transition operator has been assumed to have the form [46,47,48,49]…”
Section: Other Possible Tests Of the Critical-point Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%