2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadruple-peaked spectral line profiles as a tool to constrain gravitational potential of shell galaxies

Abstract: Context. Stellar shells observed in many giant elliptical and lenticular as well as a few spiral and dwarf galaxies presumably result from galaxy mergers. Line-of-sight velocity distributions of the shells could, in principle, if measured with a sufficiently high signalto-noise ratio, constitute a method to constrain the gravitational potential of the host galaxy. Aims. Merrifield & Kuijken (1998, MNRAS, 297, 1292) predicted a double-peaked line profile for stationary shells resulting from a nearly radial mino… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
75
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
75
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to previous work (Merrifield & Kuijken 1998;Ebrová et al 2012;Sanderson & Helmi 2013) that uses shells to constrain host halo parameters. Those analyses concentrated on modeling shell systems around individual galaxies in detail through density and line-of-sight velocity matching, while here we are interested in the general conditions that lead to shells and streams (without assuming any spectral information) in order to examine the implications of observed merger morphologies for the distribution of satellite orbital properties around a large sample of galaxies.…”
Section: Results I: Defining a Morphology Metriccontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This is in contrast to previous work (Merrifield & Kuijken 1998;Ebrová et al 2012;Sanderson & Helmi 2013) that uses shells to constrain host halo parameters. Those analyses concentrated on modeling shell systems around individual galaxies in detail through density and line-of-sight velocity matching, while here we are interested in the general conditions that lead to shells and streams (without assuming any spectral information) in order to examine the implications of observed merger morphologies for the distribution of satellite orbital properties around a large sample of galaxies.…”
Section: Results I: Defining a Morphology Metriccontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…To take this property into account, we will hereafter take r S,n as positive for even n and as negative for odd n. Self-consistent simulations show that formation of shells in several generations is common (Cooper et al 2011;Bartošková et al 2011;Seguin & Dupraz 1996). For the minor merger model, this manner of formation is actually needed to explain the high radial ranges observed in shell galaxies (the radial range is the ratio of radii of the innermost and the outermost shell); for example, in our test-particle simulations (Ebrová et al 2012) and that of Dupraz & Combes (1986), where the shells are forced to form in a single generation, more than ten shells are never visible. If the secondary core survives a passage through the primary center, it loses part of its kinetic energy by dynamical friction, so the shells formed in the subsequent generation lie in lower range of radii.…”
Section: Shell Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We do not offer the analytical expression for v S,n . However, it can be approximated by the phase velocity of apocenters v A,n because the two velocities are very similar (see Ebrová et al 2012, Table 1). The derivative of Eq.…”
Section: Shell Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stellar shells in elliptical galaxies are likely remnants of galactic interactions (see Dupraz & Combes 1986;Ebrová 2013;or Bílek et al 2015 for a review). The most accepted formation scenario is the accretion of a small satellite along an almost radial trajectory (Quinn 1983) where the stars forming the shells are released from the progenitor when it passes through the pericenter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%