Qual psicodinâmica, para qual trabalho, para quem? Mudanças no trabalho - Novos desafios para a PDT

Abstract

Cet article traite des défis concernant l’avenir de la psychodynamique du travail, qui est inexorablement lié à l’avenir du travail. Des questions telles que la cohérence épistémologique de la discipline, la prise en compte des aspects conceptuels et d’action, ainsi que la relation avec les autres disciplines sont abordées tout au long du texte. La proposition centrale de l’article est de proposer une discussion qui tienne en compte tenu l’importance de remettre en cause la division sociale du travail, surtout quand on considère qu’il y a encore beaucoup de gens qui exercent des activités dénuées de sens. La réduction des injustices liées au contenu et au sens du travail, ainsi que le renforcement de l’importance des collectifs et les dimensions relationnelles du travail sont également abordés dans le texte.

Psychodynamics of work: Bibliometric mapping in 53 years of publications indexed in Scopus and agenda for future studies

“…There was a dominance of topics on pleasure and suffering at work (Ros, 2020;Moreira, Tibães & Brito, 2020;Melo et al, 2021;Duarte et al, 2021;Karam, 2021;Trebien et al, 2021;De Vries, Blomme & De Loo, 2021;Gold, 2022); occupational stress (Siqueira et al, 2021;Rodrigues et al, 2021;Vieira et al, 2021); work precarization, gender, and subjectivity (Hirata, 2020;Sznelwar, 2020;Wlosko, 2020;Karam, 2021); work clinic (Uchida, 2021;Brasil, 2021); psychic suffering, work and mental health (Duarte & Dejours, 2020;Jeannin, 2021;Lancman, 2021); Covid-19 and work, ergonomics and sustainable work (Brunoro et al, 2020;Sigahi et al, 2021;Lancman, 2021); work organization (Dashtipour & Vidaillet, 2020); thanatomorphose (Boursier, 2020); work centrality (Demaegdt, 2020); PDW and care (Rolo & Pedrosa, 2021;Molinier, 2021;Gernet, 2021); conflict relations in organizations (Brasil et al, 2020); working conditions (Vieira et al, 2021); burnout (Gernet, 2021); the body place in living work (Dejours, 2022); spirituality and care (Hibon, 2022); relationships between visibility and recognition of caregivers' work from Covid-19 pandemic (Molinier, 2022), among others.…”

“…Duarte and Dejours (2020) studied a clinical case to explore the relationship between mental health and professional reintegration, from the perspective of the theoretical and practical understanding of PDW. Sznelwar (2020) reflected on the future changes of PDW, which are unavoidably connected to the future of work. And Wlosko (2020) addressed some challenges posed by contemporary world scenarios to PDW, particularly those related to the precarization of employment and work and, broadly, to the precarization of life as a normal model of existence.…”

“…This study focused on understanding work within the concept of Psychodynamics of Work (PDW), which is an interdisciplinary theoretical lens; therefore, it dialogues with various areas of scientific knowledge. For Sznelwar (2020), building Psychodynamics of Work occurs through the debate with these different areas, such as psychoanalysis (workers' mental health), economics (labor economics, work precarization, performance, the economic impact that accidents, work leaves, and workers' diseases cause on them, the companies, and the State), sociology (social organization of labor), ergonomics (working conditions, labor instruments, and organization of the working environment), and organizational sciences (ways of assessing individual and collective performance, people management), production sciences (quality and productivity), law (workers' rights in situations of accidents, work leaves), among others.…”